* * 2. What are at least two opinions presented by each side of the critical issue? * * Cotton and Devilly stress that Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) is not explained properly and research has proven that CISD does not give patients the results needed. * Devilly and Cotton also stated that Critical incident stress management (CISM) is also not properly explained in the treatment of traumatized individuals, which makes the process ineffective (Halgin, 2007). * Mitchell’s opinion is that Devilly and Cotton display a lack of knowledge within the text of CISM because no reference to this literature is stated by the authors.
He states that there is no critical thinking involved with creating such vague and inconsistent “jargon” in texts because the over-complexity of the words involved with modernized English leaves the intention of the writing unclear. From the perspective of George Orwell, the modernized English style of writing is nothing more than a set of equivocal standards that we all adhere to. I agree with his essay regarding politics and English language. The lines between critical writing, professional, and political language have been blurred. We may attribute the deterioration of English writing with political language.
Finally, do not copy long passages from the text of the play. Do quote short phrases or single words, putting these in speech marks. Do not write the verb “quote” to introduce a quotation. Always explain, or comment on, what you quote, using your own words. The notes that follow should give you some ideas about what happens in selected episodes from the play, about how they show the themes of the play and its characters.
Visual repetition and writing my notes help me to memorize information. I cannot draw the signs. Another barrier is that there is no one to practice with. I wish I had taken the class when my friend was still with me. Last, but not least is the lack of translation tools on the web or in our text.
While Nochlin brings up some thought provoking arguments, she fails to provide sufficient proof and uses weak examples to support her thesis. Throughout her paper, there are small inconsistencies which confuse the clarity of her point and extraneous information that is not as effective as she believed it would be. Upon completion, the reader feels that they have not been persuaded at all and in fact believe that
I was nervous and I didn’t have speaking points so I just decided to read directly from my script. One weakness that I had while delivering this speech was memory, which is one of the classical cannons of rhetoric. I didn’t practice as much as I should so I decided to read directly from my script, since I didn’t remember everything I wrote. Another weakness was pronunciation, I didn’t pronounce some words correctly which led me to pause and re-read it again. Delivering this speech was a little difficult for me since I’m a little shy in front of a group of people.
used the wrong preposition - 4.) Throughout my essay I am not very direct and don’t answer the question directly; I didn’t explain if they were effective. - 5.) Need to explain the main idea more throughout my writing - 6.) Why does he include these scenarios that I’ve mentioned?
The haiku can relate to the possible isolation of the reader as it does not have enough lines and syllables to specifically describe who the character in the poem is. Furthermore because the poem is written in first person, it seems like the character does not want to give too much information on themselves. This adds to the loneliness and sadness the theme isolation can illustrate.|| With the generous permission of Lou
In my opinion, this story is not satisfying. There are too much wanting things they didn’t say. This story The Tell-Tale Hearts Story is not spellbinded me because of the author. First, I can’t learn everything about the person in that story. At beginning i don’t know that it he is a gir lor boy, don’t know his name.
By critiquing my ability to convey an effective structure in my piece, I have realised the lack of coherence and expansion of evidence that I have yet to acknowledge, creating an effect that is less attentive to readers. Similarly, I have also, in some instances, ignored the clarity that is needed in each paragraph by the simplicity of sign posting ideas that could have created a smoother flow through the structure. Part of the reason why I condemn this piece of writing as ‘ineffective’ has much to do with the lack of clarity in that which I defined as structure as opposed to what structure really consisted of. My inability to recognize the significance of structure in a piece of writing added to a loss of creativity and individuality. The idea of a structured essay, in my mind, solely consisted on five separate paragraphs, with the essentials of an introduction and conclusion.