Servant leadership is all about creating teamwork, community, and allowing for others to be involved in decision making, strong ethics, and caring behavior. These are important factors as well as encouraging personal growth among the staff (Spears, 2005). The leader and the servant are usually thought of as opposites however, the servant leader model has shown how the two opposites are intertwined to create a model that teaches about how to put others first and promote the sharing of decision making (Spears, 2005). This model focuses on the positive impact on the employees as well as the community, rather than worrying so much about profit (Spears, 2005). Compare and Contrast Servant Leadership with Transformational Leadership Transformational Leadership is another excellent form of leadership that focuses on the leader as a role model, the ability to generate
To be a servant and a leader simultaneously describes the work of leaders as a service to servants and thus practicing servicing leadership as opposed to pervasive leadership. This implies the uncompromising orientation of leadership towards the interests of the servants which makes the leaders servants themselves. What are some of the dimensions of servant leadership? The dimensions of servant leadership can be divided in the two terms servant and leader. The dimension of the servant would include characteristics such as “listening“,“empathy“, and „healing“.
Transformational leadership inspires followers to transcend their self-interests for the good of the organization and plays an extraordinary effect on their followers. Characteristics of transformational leaders contingent reward promises rewards for good performance. Management by exception watches and searches for deviations from rules and standards, management by exception intervenes only if standards not met, laissez-faire avoids making decisions, idealized influence provides vision and sense of mission, inspirational motivation communicates high expectations, intellectual stimulation promotes intelligence, and individualized consideration gives personal attention. This particular leadership is not opposing approaches to getting the job done, they complement each other, even thou they are not equally important.” Transformational leader are more effective they are more creative, and they encourage their team to be creative also. Personal leadership Expanding the company gave me the opportunity to identify the type of leadership position that best suited me.
Per the teachings of Abraham Maslow, there are general needs (physiological, safety, love, and esteem) which have to be fulfilled before a person is able to act unselfishly. These needs were dubbed "deficiency needs." While a person is motivated to fulfill these basal desires, they continue to move toward growth, and eventually self-actualization. The satisfaction of these needs is quite healthy, while preventing their gratification makes us ill or act evilly. As a result, for adequate workplace motivation, it is important that lead ship understands which needs are active for individual employee motivation.
Moreover, the subordinates become productive and effective because of a succeed leadership. It is possible to say that a good leader can turn a weak business, for example, into a good one. However a poor leader can destroy even a strong organization. Nowadays the leaders have to be capable to work with different cultures’ people. Moreover, they have to handle with the diversity of their opinions and comprehend what those mean.
Nevertheless, the priority of individuals is to use them in order to achieve success of the single idea. Therefore, in my community leader is a person who is respected and similarly he respects others. Such relationships are the most profitable ones when both parts benefit from such relationships. Having analyzed leadership behavior, I have come to the conclusion that there is a certain difference between me and leaders in my community. Leaders are natural orators and they are characterized by desire to risk in order to achieve the desirable goal.
Running head: SERVANT LEADERSHIP Complete Servant Leadership Richelle Crowell Indiana Wesleyan University Abstract “The servant-leader is servant first…It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead”.-Robert K. Greenleaf COMPLETE SERVANT LEADERSHIP Servant leadership is a term that was developed by Robert K. Greenleaf in 1970. Greenleaf was one of the premier figures in leadership, education, management, nonprofit and religious circles. (OriginalServantLeader) Greenleaf wrote a book on the concept titled, “Servant Leadership” . In his book, Greenleaf wrote that a “true” leader is a servant first.
REGENT UNIVERSITY The Understanding and Practice of ServantLeadership Servant Leadership Research Roundtable – August 2005 Larry C. Spears President & CEO The Greenleaf Center for Servant-Leadership The servant-leader is servant first. It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. The best test is: do those served grow as persons; do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants? —Robert K. Greenleaf The mightiest of rivers are first fed by many small trickles of water, and an apt way of conveying my belief that the growing number of individuals and organizations practicing servant-leadership has increased from a trickle to a river.
They also need support and praise to build their self-esteem and involvement in decision-making to restore their commitment. S3 – Participating / Supporting – The leader passes day-to-day decisions, such as task allocation and processes, to the worker. The leader facilitates and takes part in decisions, but control is with the worker. This style is used in situations where a worker is clearly competent but lacks confidence or motivation. They do not need much direction because of their skills, but support is
With his type of leadership the leader shows concern for his employee’s workers and he gets back the complete trust and loyalty of his staff. (Erben and Guneser, Gul and Ayse). This would have been the preferred leadership style in this case for this particular problem highlighted and he was initially too focused as a formal leader. Sensemaking and Resilience Questioning “Common sense is not so common.” (Voltaire) So what is sensemaking and common sense exactly? “ Sensemaking is what it says it is , namely , making something sensible ( Weick 1995) and that it is it is not only applied to using the information “meaningful lived experience” but also applying making decisions to be made for the future not only relying on experience.