To what extent did The Ku Klux Klan prevented African Americans from gaining Civil Rights in the years 1960-64? Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, the Ku Klux Klan re-emerged, feeling that their goal of white supremacy was being challenged by the Civil Rights Campaign. Between these years they created many problems for the campaign, and could even be blamed for the lack of Civil Rights legislation in this period. One of the key ways in which the Klan blocked any progress was through intimidation and fear. In many Southern States the force and presence of the Klan was enough to dissuade African Americans from joining the campaign - Mississippi, as state with the highest amount of Klan activity also had the lowest amount of registered African American voters, and the lowest amount of NAACP activists.
In the year 1948, the National Party was voted into power and began to institute a policy of apartheid, which much more heavily favored the white minority at the expense of the black majority. The first multi-racial elections in 1994 brought an end to apartheid and ushered in a majority rule. Since then, South Africa has struggled to address apartheid-era imbalances in decent housing, health care, and education. South Africa and the United States have had similar ethical perspectives related to their history in dealing with separation of the people at one point or another. The United States still to this day is dealing with the aftermath of slavery and the Apartheid South Africa era continues to loom around.
But Africa's government was the worst example of racialism and violation of the human rights. However, Nelson Mandela still stood up for what he thought was right and, led his people to freedom. He rose above his personal interests and always kept the interest of his nation above all. He was offered attractive gifts as a price of his loyalty and sincerity but he never accepted those offers. He accepted a prolonged imprisonment over the freedom that was over shadowed with a piece of slavery.
King had a very strong opinion on segregation and made many personal sacrifices to put an end to it while Obama tried to defuse the uproar created by Reverend Wright’s remarks and called for more unity amongst the races. Although King clearly made a better argument, I feel that both King and Obama accomplished what they set out to do in their respective letter and speech: to raise awareness and put an end to racism in
Martin Luther king Jr was one of the most influential people in the civil rights movement. King fought for civil rights in the south, he followed the same ways of Gandhi with a non-violence movement. King believed in peaceful protest and use of civil disobedience. King believed violence wouldn’t help the African Americans gain the civil rights they wanted.
THE APARTHEID: A SOCIAL AND POLITICAL INJUSTICE South Africa is a country afflicted by a past of enforced racism and separation of its multi-racial community. The Europeans of Great Britain invaded the country and imposed a political system known as ‘Apartheid’. This system severely restricted the rights and lifestyle of the non-white inhabitants of the country forcing them to live entirely in separation. This system of imposed racial ideas although now ended, has left an imprint on the thoughts and culture of African descendants worldwide. To be discussed are the affects that this sociopolitical system had on the indigenous peoples of South Africa, as well as the emergence of African independence across the political landscape.
Black literature, music, theatre, fashion and food all flourished during the 1970’s However: - Black Power bought division to the movement, as some campaigners developed increasingly militant policies and groups like SNCC were broken by the strain. - By accepting violence, the supporters of Black Power undermined King’s policy of maintaining the moral high ground and lost much of the white sympathy he had worked so hard to gain. Of course, many of them made clear they had no desire for this support. - Despite one or two attempts, such as Stokeley Carmichael’s book
Gandhi stood up and he became a leader to the people in India. He was unhappy with the foreign power in his home country. Also this is what happened with Nelson Mandela in South Africa fighting against the law of apartheid, to gain equal rights for the black majority in that country. This law prevented the blacks in South Africa to live a normal life. This all changed when Nelson Mandela decided to start fighting for the equal rights of the the blacks.
Those who felt the conflict was detrimental to their freedom united and supported Mandela. This created the first main group of mixed race within South Africa for decades. This unity between the two races exponentially increased until Apartheid was lifted in 1994. A “Rainbow Nation” was rapidly created through the experience of conflict. When a society is immersed in an ongoing conflict of difference, the uniting force is the shared effect that comes as a result.
We can see the noticeable change in economic, black consciousness, political and social features of America. Others may argue that, although there was clear de jure desegregation, de facto segregation still remained especially in the North. On the other hand, many campaigns carried out in this time period gained plenty of white liberal support which brought a great help to improving the equality of blacks in