The main reimbursement of a team is to identify inhibitors that prevent individuals from reaching their goals and remove them, for a positive outcome. A team can be successful if members have respect for each other and motivate each other, this will lead to a positive task outcome. Team cohesion Team cohesion is when a team sticks together. When a team is operating under difficult
While fringe members were more inclined to recognize that they had made fools of themselves and to put it down to experience, committed members were more likely to re-interpret the evidence to show that they were right all along. When someone is forced to do something they really don't want to do, dissonance is created between their cognition and their behavior. Forced compliance occurs when an individual performs an action that is inconsistent with his or her beliefs. The behavior can't be changed, since it is already in the past, so dissonance will need to be reduced by re-evaluating their attitude to what they have done. This prediction has been tested
So we learn the virtue by copying someone who is a role model or mentor to confirm our virtue is right and finally practice and experience said virtue. Already we can see a weakness forming within Aristotle’s concept of virtue ethics, foe when learning our virtues from education, emulation and experience. How do we know we are being educated in the correct and socially accepted way? For example in a different time period or different country we may be taught that being rash for example is a good virtue to possess, where as in modern western societies today being rash is thought of as being a bad trait to have. Carrying on with this train of thought, we have the same problem with the aspect of emulation, or in other words copying.
Thus, there must be forms of imperfections occurring in the World State. Moving on Mustapha Mond conveys his reasons to why sacrifices were made, and how they impact other people’s happiness. Nevertheless, freedoms of individuals, and relationships, were abolished to achieve happiness. The imperfection of sacrifices was used to gain perfection in terms of stability and happiness, but then to what extent is happiness really achieved? It is true imperfection exists alongside perfection,
This means it learnt doing the same escape routine because it knew the consequences were rewarding. This argues that a particular action or behaviour is shaped by the aftermath or consequences of that action. There are however criticisms such as that humans do not respond to
A weak-sense critical thinker is although it is working well for the thinker in some respects, it is missing certain important, higher-level skills and values of critical thinking. Most significantly, it fails to consider, in good faith, viewpoints that contradict its own viewpoint. It lacks fair-mindedness. Another traditional name for the weak-sense thinker is sophist. Sophistry is the art of winning arguments regardless of whether there are problems in the thinking being used, regardless of whether relevant viewpoints are being ignored.
Dewey believes we consider these more as abilities that exist far from our impulsive desires. So in short, bad habits are acts that make us feel shameful, good habits are admirable. John Dewey mentions though out his writing on habits and will WE are our habit. Now even though I do not entirely comprehend all the points he makes through out the writing, I do know that he mentions several times that to fix or undo our bad habits we must replace with an equally energizing habit that is of goodness. Also to go along with that, you must be able to have more than solely will power to defy a habit.
Overall, the strengths of his argument seem to overshadow the little vulnerability that he has portrayed. It is important that he readily chase away the remnants of his idealism that remain, as this would perhaps alter his perceptions of his community as a whole, therefore enhancing his theories and
Philosopher John Stewart Mill describes utilitarian acts as “…actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill, p. 58). Motives for actions do not matter, as long as the result is a positive and desired one. Utilitarianism works upon the happiness principle, which means that for an act to be considered morally justifiable, you must do what maximizes pleasure in your life (Mill, p.58). Although this point of view seems like a great view to live by, it may be flawed, especially when it comes to monetary debt within the community. A flaw that I have come across is that it is difficult to determine exactly what a utilitarian act is.
(1978) described self-handicapping as obstacle to successful performance that is constructed by a person to protect or enhance self-esteem. Hence, though such obstacle may meddle with the performance of an individual, it allows the person to discount responsibility for failure and rather take credit for achieved success. If one fails, attribution to poor skill can be discounted because of the presence of another potential cause. If one manages to succeed, the attribution to his outstanding ability will increase because good performance emerged despite the presence of an obstacle (Kelly, 1971). In other words, self-handicapping behaviors are designed so that there are desirable attributions for both success and