Critically evaluate Wittgenstein’s language games theory as an approach to religious language. God’s transcendence means there is widespread discussion as to how any statements in regards to his existence or nature can be deemed as ‘meaningful’. Influential philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein 1889 - 1951 was heavily involved in studies of Language and developed the idea that the purpose of philosophy was to clear up the conceptual confusions that arose through our unexamined use of language (including statements of religious significance and any religious language) and that words are a function of language, not just simply a signifying of an object. 'Whereof one cannot speak, therefore one must be silent.' Wittgenstein believed, in opposition to Rene Descartes’ Cogito Ergo Sum (I think, therefore I am) that language was a social product, and that statements made about the world were basic and 'groundless' and believed that judgement through opposing 'language games' was not possible, as they are parts of different discourse.
(Johnson, 2009) There is an unwritten code that religions have that tells the believer how to live, how to bring more in to the religion and what do if the person does not want to believe. (Johnson, 2009) The controversial element of religion is the centralization of authority or heads such priests, and pastors. These men and women are in charge of teaching,
This presents an issue with the moral and rational reasoning behind the deeds. It’s understood that the act is warranted by the divine and therefore the ethical is no longer in effect. The next term to define is the one that most of us would be familiar with and can relate to. If you’re a religious individual or have some faith in the ultimate, you might consider yourself labeled under this category. As previously stated, in order to be a KoF, you must be willing to nullify the ethical standards you are most accustomed to in order to comply to the declaration of God or any other divine or spiritual medium.
Religion is a set practice of beliefs in a moral code and rituals, often including some sort of salvation or enlightenment from doing such, and a belief in certain myths. As well as practicing a certain belief, religion is often equated with a belief in God. This is true in most aspects and for most religions, but a few Eastern religions do not believe there is a God per say, but more of an energy or flow that almost "controls" the universe. Science stems from the latin root "scientiae" which meant "knowledge". Science is the practical observation and theorized belief in what can be seen, felt, heard, smelt, and tasted.
Disagree? How might you incorporate any aspects of the host practice into your daily life? Insight Content/clarity of expression – logic of analysis Organization/completeness Grammar, punctuation, sentence structure and spelling How has your introduction to this host spiritual practice/religion changed your worldview? How has this host spiritual practice/religion changed your perception of yourself? Other information you feel is
Analogies are not confined to language either, pictures could be used. However I am looking into the use of religious language; in the forms of symbol and analogy. Many philosophers have analysed the use of religious language such as A.J Ayer, Wittgenstein, Karl Popper, Tillich and Aquinas. Their main concern was whether or not certain uses of language are meaningful when referring to God. To critically compare the use of symbol with the use of analogy is to assess the meaningfulness of Tillich’s and Aquinas’s methods of expressing understanding of God.
The scribe has creatively utilised this metaphor as the name of the book to display that there is an amount of religion in the book. The individual features of this book were watching God significance that they were waiting for God to response their pleas. although, if the significance was taken literally, it could easily signify that the persons were just observing God. thus, it means that the literal meaning of the metaphor has been utilised to signify differently and display the distinct requests of the persons even though they appeared to have been heading for darker
What a person believes can tell you a lot about the kind of person they are and the kind of person they will become in the future. The word belief has a very broad spectrum. When I am asked about my beliefs, the first thing that typically comes to mind is religion. This is a type of belief that everyone has. Whether you are a Christian, Buddhist, or atheist, you have some type of belief system.
Religion will be the structure that will provide all the support for my argument. ‘Contemporary’ a word that best describes an event that exists and occurs at present. Contemporary is something unstable that changes and varies over time. The form of beliefs, traditions and norms can be classified as being contemporary as they were formed through human acts and behaviors which, can be changed and updated. ‘Social Structures’ a phrased used to describe a social group within a society that is shaped by the behaviour of its members.
A framework for interpretation is understood as assumptions that each person/groups makes in order to identity and understand their surroundings/environment. An example of this can be seen with the study of religion, different cultures that subscribe to different ways of worship, different lifestyles and different worldviews. Each religion has its own origin and specific nature. The validity of each religion is sought in the religious manuscripts that have been handed down over the centuries. Limitations lie in that fact that manuscripts are based on word of mouth representations of events that occurred and teachings that were handed down.