One of the minor ones were that you were allowed to get a divorce and one of the brutal ones were that Henry VIII Henry was born in 1491 in Greenwich Palace near London and died in 1547 and between those years Henry made some changes to the church. One of the changes he made were making divorces legal as the pope said no to his request to get a divorce with Catherine of Aragon. Another reason was that he wanted more money so he could got to war with France which was very expensive. He sent his people to close the monasteries down and collect all the money and he collected all the money from the Church of England (the church he founded). Henry also wanted more power because he wanted Europe to know that England is a powerful country and he wanted a son because he thought that men were more powerful than women.
Some may say that Henry was largely successful in achieving his aims with his biggest success being the battle of the spurs in 1513. Henry VIII want to be seen as a different king to his father who had a bad reputation for being aware of his money and not engaging in many wars which the nobilities did not like. He started by giving away the crowns land and gave many titles to the nobilities to prove that he would be different to his father. Catherine of Aragon, who had married Henry’s brother Arthur was still kept in England after Arthur had died. Henry had immediately married her after all the delays that his father had caused.
How successful was Henry VII in dealing with challenges to his royal authority in the years 1489-1499? 24 marks In the years 1489 to 1499, Henry dealt with three domestic uprisings, as well as foreign wars. The main challenges to his authority as king came from rebellions and pretenders to the throne. The fact that he was still on the throne until 1509 shows that he was successful at dealing with these challenges and was a capable and effective ruler. The Yorkshire rebellion in 1489, which was due to people in Yorkshire having to pay taxes for a war in Brittany, was not really a success for Henry; although he dealt with it sufficiently for it not to seriously affect his reign, it was not as much a success as he might have hoped.
Original Penguin represent a cultural change for Perry Ellis International in the sense that it is the first time that Perry Ellis has reintroduced a old brand which they had acquired years ago and reinvent it to attract a different target audience. As mentioned in the video, the fashion industry is now dictated by the demands of the younger consumers. The things they seek in purchasing apparels are fashionable, affordability and not only wearable during sports. Chris Kolbe reintroduction of Original Penguin with his ideas and innovation into the market has not enable the Penguin logo apparel but also Perry Ellis to attract young consumers below the age of 30 which previously was not possible. By granting Chris Kolbe full control of the Original Penguin
Henry had to bring stability back to England. The king needed to win over the nobles if he was to remain secure as king, he needed a positive relationship with them. There were some nobles who did support Henry because of their Lancastrian backgrounds, then there were some that supported him due to them seeing him as mean to social and political advancement, then there were the nobles that opposed him; the Lambert and Warbeck rebellions show this. Getting the nobles to support him was a huge challenge that would take years for the king to accomplish as there were more nobles than the king. Over the course of the fifteenth century the English nobility had grown in power, however Henry VII was quite fortunate that 25% of leading noble lines had died out.
The problem is, to achieve this newfound opportunity Jackson wants to remove thousands of Indians from their settlements and move them to Oklahoma (Roark, 260). If you disregard the lives of all the Indians who were massacred for not leaving when Jackson ordered them to, I guess obtaining new land was a good thing. But it’s a bit hard for me to just ignore that harsh racism. Overall, I believe Jackson was a good President and certainly the most influential Democrat. However, in some instances I think he went too far, such as forcefully making Native Americans leave and some of the comments he made about the issue.
Swot Analysis Opportunities: 1. Proposition of freeing King Richard -by securing the release of the King would be very beneficial to the merrymen, as it would secure their position adding as a source of income and also add more positive political light to their situation -the consequences of failing would be very negative, however in this case the benefits outweigh the negatives 2. Possible association with the barons -if Robin achieves success after joining the group of barons, this would be very beneficial to his league as well as power of his merrymen he would be free from the ruling of the Sheriff and especially Prince John 3. Using the Travellers as a source of income -due to their strong power in what they do in business in, the merrymen are well capable of taking money from others especially using them as a source of financial resources Threats: 1. Intensive power of competitive rivals; Sheriff and Prince John -two of Robin’s main rivals are the: Sheriff and Prince John, also the ones who pose the greatest amount of threat to his operation since they also have the most military capabilities as well as political connections -both of his rivals are also in direct competition with each other, so the actions of both must be closely watched -they combatively pose a high level of threat which can cause taxations to the residents of the forest, their persistent efforts to capture Robin Hood and his Merrymen suppliers is also on the higher end of the scale -because of them, at any point Prince John and the Sheriff, which will cut of their suppliers, could capture those who support Robin Hood 2.
Another one is that the group wasn’t the same culture when it first started out, sure it was all to fight against the sheriff, but they started picking up people that sound like they don’t really need to be a part of the group. Also his thoughts about killing the sheriff which went against the group statement and the offer that was given to him by the baron. 2) What is the role of the organizational leader as strategist and articulator of global goals? Define the mission – since the group became bigger it feels like it has changed. Also for his group heed needs to find out all the people that he’s affecting due to his large group, who’s at stake and to establish goals that the whole group can agree and work towards versus just being in a band of doing whatever it is they want to do.
For those of the knightly class, it was a way of penance; by killing the “heathens” they were able to cleanse their sins. And for those of the much higher class, it was a way of eliminating rivals through false accusations of heresy that would allow them to wage war without the religious ramifications from the pope. And then for the Italian cities, it all came down to money. With their already constant war with the Arabs for control over the Mediterranean, a crusade to take land from them with the help of other armies was most beneficial. They also made sure to gain what they could, financially, from the Christian armies as well by charging a great deal for there services as transports to the East.
This is why Robin Hood decided against Sheriff, which is kind of against the system or rule of that time. 5. What are the pros and cons of accepting the offer of the barons to assist in securing King Richard’s release from prison? Pro: Alliance with baron which help Robin Richard to easy to release