Rob Parson Case

557 Words3 Pages
Rob Parson’s assessment is not an ordinary performance evaluation or promotion process when we look in to the Morgan Stanley’s perspective. Especially, Morgan Stanley describes their culture and people as an “environment that fosters teamwork and innovation, by developing and utilizing their employees’ abilities to the fullest, and by treating each other with dignity and respect.” Crucial statements are teamwork, dignity and respect. However, Parson defies Morgan Stanley’s missions and culture. At this point of view, promotion should not happen if someone obviously contradicts with Company Culture. Initially, Nasr promised a promotion but right now Parson is not fit to be managing director. Nasr should focus on developing Parson’s Skills so he will eliminate the risk of Parson leaving. It is going to be a fair evaluation so Nasr should briefly explain that Parson have to neutralize adaptation problems and if Parson reaches these goals, he will be promoted. Nasr should offer 6-9 month evaluation to improve some of the critical&downward skills such as Leadership and Management of People (2.5), Evaluation/Development&Coaching (2.0), Management of Diverse Workforce (2.0) and Team Player Skills (2.5). Also Nasr has to be direct and straightforward while he is talking with Parson. Guidance into unknown culture should be an important learning mechanism for Parson. Evaluation and Development Summary Performance Summary, Including Accomplishments Accomplishments: • Produced strong revenues and generated a great deal of new business for the firm. • Makes things happen that wouldn’t otherwise happen • Establishing Strong and solid customer relationships. • Helped to expand many of the clients accounts to other divisions of Morgan Stanley • Helped to increase Morgan Stanley’s market share %2 to %12.2. Parson is a perfect man of duty. Especially, he knows what needs
Open Document