Because of the soldier’s bad habits, the person who slept on the bottom bunk would wake up in the morning covered in the others pee, which became extremely unhealthy. Himmelstoss used his power to humiliate these boys. Another person who abused his power in wartime was the doctor at Paul and Albert’s hospital. He abused his position to perform extremely debatable operations on patients that had little say in their own health. He crippled many patients in his search to find a cure for people with flat feet.
Although he did kill a few people in the story, he never really wanted to. When he defeated Bonzo and Stilson, he did it so that he would not just win that fight, he’d win all of the fights that they would ever have. He never meant to kill anyone. When he found out that he killed all the buggers he started crying. The IF lied to him and told him that it was just a game when it was not.
He also picks fights with all the other jurors, he even threatened to kill juror #8 after he called him a sadist. He expressed a lot of anger in his thoughts which changed the way a few jurors thought of the defendant. No one knew till the end when juror #3 started crying and revealed his sensitive side. He looked grumpy and disturbed the whole movie and his emotions finally break lose. The real reason he was being so obnoxious was because he had issues with his teenage son which effected his opinions about teenagers.
Their sarcastic remarks to the powerless victim are evocative of the sarcasm Alex and his gang used on the victims that they beat and sometimes raped. Whilst Alex is suffering from the movie clips, Doctor Brodsky simply says ‘Excellent, excellent, excellent.’ Here, the Doctor is clearly portraying how he does not wish to show any sympathy towards helpless Alex, as he did do to his previous victims. The detail in which Alex goes into whilst in distress is extremely intense and vivid. Alex says ‘I was sweating a malenky bit with the pain in my guts and a horrible thirst and my gulliver going throb throb throb.’ For me, the repetition of the word ‘and’ explains to the reader just how many feelings of pain and discontent Alex is going through. Words such as ‘sweating’ ‘guts’ and ‘thirst’ are all words that we associate with labour and hard work and that is exactly what Alex seems to be going through.
The director shows this by the sounds and angles of the camera during scenes and by the way many people talk at once shows the differences of life between the city and the peacefulness of Samuels home. The close up on Samuel’s face during the murder with the expression of terrified face with a wide open eyes and the tension of the music shows us the corruption of his innocence and the conflict with the world around him there is also another evidence when he tells Eli that he would only kill the bad man. Schaefer, McFee and Fergie go to the Amish world looking for john book they are faced with many obstacles. When thewy first enter arrive at the farm, the soundtrack and the close up view on the guns are there to remind us the violence and show us that that is the only way they could keep their corruption. The gun fires between John Book and McFee are there to represent the violence and even earlier in the film at the parking area, the guns are used as a symbol of thriller and crime.
The trouble is, Leo is happy with his small, if not quite ethical, business. Leo joins them on the schemes even though he will be the flaw in their operations. A series of police raids are conducted by Joe and everything seems to be going as planned until a twist appears in the story where a rival mob headed by Tucker’s old partner Fico begins pressuring Leo and ruin the plans. Fico’s gang is more aggressive and shoots first to get whatever they want, Joe wants his brother out because things are getting to dangerous. All this happening and Joe is still romantically involved with Leo’s employee who is too sweet of women for Joe.
A member of a rival gang, the “Guardians”, stabs Andy, a member of the “Royals.” The “Guardians” do not think of Andy as Andy, they just see him as an adversary. When the gang member stabs Andy, he says, “This is for you Royal!” In this situation, the gang member does not know Andy’s name, he just notices the purple “Royal” jacket. In modern day, people judge based on the way others look, dress, or even who they talk to. In “On the Sidewalk Bleeding,” many people, such as the intoxicated man, the old woman, and Freddie and Angela, ambled past Andy without helping him. The old woman and the intoxicated man did not help because they could not hear Andy because of the rain.
13 September 2012 Shooting an Elephant George Orwell tells about his experience in Moulmein, Lower Burma, as a local police officer. He was an officer that was hated by the people he served. By using an event that occurred one day on the job, he begins to explain the different factors of how imperialism affects a village or country. Imperialism is evil and it affects the oppressed as well as the oppressor; by creating the image that the oppressor must make the right decision to remain in power. Orwell also goes on to explain how much he dislikes his job as well as his home-country by saying, “All I knew was that I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make my job impossible.” The story begins with a simple call to the police station, asking for help with an elephant that had been terrorizing the village.
Tsotsi: A Clichéd Redemption Of A Criminal Tsotsi is a cruel, ruthless criminal. Yet, with the use of effective filming and storyline, he evokes sympathy at the end of the film when he is arrested. The audience believes that he has changed into a better man in a matter of days. This is very cliché and typical of any film that shows the evolution of a bad character into a good character. I think that the audience is very naive for feeling sympathy for Tsotsi because he is a criminal that was involved with the murder of two people; Butcher and Zachariah.
By the narrator already assuming psychological judgment from the reader, the reader can also feel to question and doubt his sanity through just the first-person perspective. His madness is challenged when he admits the old man has done nothing to him and that he “loves the old man”, but yet is still going to murder him because of his eye. The reader also learns of the narrator’s psychological mindset right before he murders the old man. “But the beating grew louder, louder! I