Reflection on Hamlet

583 Words3 Pages
Reflection on Hamlet For me the most striking thing about Hamlet is the idea of being divided, the idea of two distinct yet almost unreachable ideals with a grey area in-between is what creates tension in the play. Hamlet is presented as a renaissance man in a world which is transitioning towards a humanist mindset. Elizabethan England was also like this – one foot in the feudal past and one foot in the future. This kind of limbo is mirrored throughout the play. Hamlet is essentially divided between revenge and inaction, passion and philosophy. Many of his soliloquy and musings are centred around his desire to have the passion of an actor or the will the exact revenge for his father. The play begins in a state of disorder and by the end we see that it was a time between two rightful kings. Old Hamlet is portrayed as the archetypal feudal king, Denmark under his rule was threatened by Fortinbras' invasion. Old Hamlet remains in purgatory after he dies, he says to Hamlet: ‘I am your father’s spirit,/ doomed for a certain term to walk the night/ And for the day confined to fast in fires/ Till the foul crimes done in my days of nature/ Are burnt and purged away’. The play is set up in such a way that although this murder is definitively branded as a wrongdoing, Hamlet's seeking revenge is not necessarily the correct course of action. Claudius' murder is seen as an atrocity by the Elizabethan audience, not only does it break the Divine Right of Kings but it is also fratricide. Yet ironically his rule brings peace to Denmark and his diplomacy deflects Fortinbras' aggression. This brings about another grey area to the play – the divide between right and wrong. Hamlet battles with this concept and he concludes that “there is nothing either good/ Or bad but thinking makes it so”. The divide between what is good and bad is unclear and hence Hamlet finds that seeking

More about Reflection on Hamlet

Open Document