Discuss the various types of confirmations and what forms you will implement and why. Solution: There are two types of confirmations to assess accounts receivables: positive confirmations and negative confirmations. Positive confirmations are addressed to the debtors requesting the receipt to confirm directly whether the balance as stated on the confirmation request is correct or incorrect. A blank confirmation form does not state the amount on the confirmation but instead requests the debtor to fill in the information. An invoice confirmation requires an individual invoice be confirmed rather than the debtor’s entire account receivable balance.
Later that day police found both respondents at Greenwood's in which large quantities of cocaine and hashish. The police arrested both victims for felony of drugs and were placed on posted bail. This process was repeated again on May 4th by another investigator named Robert Rahaeuser who also found more evidence of narcotic use in garbage bags. Facts of case's verdict Greenwood
In conclusion, if I were the judge ruling in this case, I could apply the exclusionary rule and any evidence that was obtained during the unlawful search would not be admissible. I would rule this way with the Mapp decision as my precedent, to ensure that police departments are encouraging their officers adhere to constitutional
A warrant was issued for his arrest after police wanted to question him in relation to an assault in the Sydney suburb of Zetland. At about 7pm (AEDT) on December 29, a 50-year-old Zetland man was allegedly assaulted and his Mercedes four-wheel-drive was stolen from his home. The alleged thief was someone whom the man had met online, police said. The NSW Supreme Court was told in 2005 that Jennings had stabbed Giuseppe Vitale in the neck with a kitchen knife after being tied up during a sexual liaison with the man, whom he had met through the internet. He was found not guilty of murdering Giuseppe Vitale on grounds of mental illness in 2005 by the NSW Supreme Court.
. BUCHANAN-SALLY HEARSAY/NONHEARSAY Hearsay An out of court statement offered for evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Here, Buchannan, and agent in the DEA, will testify that he spoke with Sally, whose son overdosed on cocaine. The facts do not directly indicate if Sally’s son received his cocaine from Danforth. However, Sally’s reaction of fainting when she saw the photograph of Danforth can be inferred that she recognized the Defendant, Danforth, who sold the drugs to her son who overdosed.
McDonald on the grounds of the basis of diversity removed the case to Federal District Court, and argued that under the Petition Clause of the First Amendment "the right of the people . . . to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" provided him with immunity against liability. Ruling: Ultimately the court ruled in favor of Smith (8-0) and it was decided by the Federal District Court that although McDonald was within the general protection of the Petition Clause it does not grant him absolute immunity.
There were many witnesses at the scene of the crime. Please could you from these five pictures say who you think is guilty and what punishment you would give them? Shoplifting carries varying sentences varying from: Prison sentence up to 7 years, Tagging and banning from shops and area, Community service and Fines.” While reading this to our participants we showed them five mug shot pictures: Our Independent variable was controlled by us the experimenters always reading out the same crime scenario and showing the same mug shots. The Participants would then answer who they thought was guilty and what punishment they would give, we recorded the results in a table like this: Participant: | Male or Female | Who was guilty ? | Punishment given: | | | | | We used a table so we could record all the data evenly and it allows us to see and similarities or differences easily.
Each claim will be examined separately. The Misrepresentation Act (1967) has made it possible for the recission of contract by removal of certain bars to innocent misrepresentation. Section 1(b) of the Misrepresentation Act (1967) stated that, ‘Where a person has entered into a contract after a misrepresentation has been made to him, and the contract has been performed; he would be entitled to rescind the contract without alleging fraud.’ Consequently, SkyReach can proceed to rescind the contract on the ground of innocent misrepresentation based on the fact that Holger believed that his statement was true and that the local news was reasonable ground for Holger’s belief. Although, Holger’s statement was made during a meeting before the contract, there is a possibility of SkyReach Ltd. arguing reliance on the misrepresentation specifically by entering into the contract with Holger. Lord Denning LJ, in Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams (1957) argued that the more important a statement made during negotiations, the more likely it is a term of the contract.
Identification is the act of claiming an identity using just one authentication factor and authentication is the act of proving a claimed identity using one or more authentication factors. Identification in its simplest form can be related to the requestor of a resource to input user identification such as an e-mail or some other form of user ID. Two-factor authentication is when two different authentication factors are used to prove ones identity. Multi-factor is just as it sounds meaning that two or more authentication factors must be used to verify a person’s identity. That being
if the defendant had an honest belief). In the case of DPP v Harper [1997] 1 WLR 1406 the court held that insanity was not a defence as it requires mens rea and as a strict liability crime is not valid. Most traffic offences are strict liability, i.e. speeding, where a ticket is issued regardless of whether or not you thought you were within the speed limit. Cases of Statuary Rape also hold the defendant strictly liable even if the defendant believed the victim to be of the age of consent, for example the case R. v G [2008] UKHL 37 where the appellant held that the complainant had told him she was 15.