With an air taser, you can disable an attacker from up to 10 feet away. This means that you do not have to be close enough to touch the attacker, as required with a stun gun. Tasers are commonly used by the police force, and much research has been completed on their efficiency. They are an effective means of self-defense, especially when used against someone who threatens use of a knife or blunt weapon, as you are able to maintain a safe distance from them. Some people do not like the idea of using air tasers because they deliberately cause pain to the attacker.
These markings are also referred to as “toolmarks.” If the investigators are able to locate a suspected weapon, they will then be able to compare the markings made on the ammunition with those that are created by the weapon in their custody. This may sound like a very difficult task as it would essentially require disassembling the entire gun and somehow breaking open the barrel to see inside of it. This would be a quite expensive and time consuming venture. There is a much simpler method to achieve the results that are sought after. All that an investigator would really need is a second piece of ammunition shot from the same gun that committed the crime in the first place.
One can do many things to you with a gun in their hand, from a robbery to a murder. Simply, most Americans are afraid of one another. Besides, are guns really the best protection against others? It is always possible to have a decent alarm system for robberies, to have a dog when outside in the neighborhood or simply learn martial arts for self-protection. Martial arts are created for self defense so why don’t people spend more time learning them instead of wasting their money on a gun which can break or be used against their own will?
A muzzle compensator goes on the end of the rifle barrel and is used to prevent the gun from rising as the gun is fired. Items like these make the weapons perfect for home defense, target shooting or sporting events. By removing these items it results in a gun that is not as safe as guns made without these items (What the "Assault Weapon" Bans Really Prohibits, 2008). The same people that would have you believe assault weapons are only meant to kill people also state that assault weapons unleash extraordinary firepower (Siebel,
In addition, Shaffer effectively defends her idea that banning handguns will have no effect on reduction of violent crime, but may actually increase instances of gun crimes. This is due to the fact that civilians would no longer be able to defend themselves effectively. The second article, “Gun control standoff” both sides remain unsolved in bitter debate. Gun control continues to bring out the worst in public opinions. Jost states: “Gun control supporters blame the high rate of violent crime and the large number of gun accidents and suicides on the easy availability of firearms and
Topic: The increase of gun control legislation decreases civilian safety. Guns are not for everyone. When dealing with guns, it is key to maintain the control on this lethal weapon. Improper use can lead to great consequences but proper gun control can reduce violence and the threat of crime within neighborhoods. Gun control is most worldwide debated topics today.
Is that really any one's business? Also anyone should be allowed to purchase a gun because is this not the land of freedom? That should include the freedom to purchase a gun and use it for whatever we choose to. It should not matter that by registering guns, police detectives would have an easier time tracking its owner if involved in a crime and ultimately leading to solving crimes a lot quicker. Guns definitely serve a lot of useful purposes other than killing.
The main topic is however, should other people besides the police be able to carry and own a gun. I can say that we would all agree that guns or any type of weapons are not wanted in "just anybody's hands". However, this is the very reason we need to be able to protect ourselves. There are people in this world that are not mentally stable, and if they want to have a gun, they will have a gun whether obtained legally or illegally. This knowledge alone should make people understand why everyone should be allowed, at least given the opportunity to own a gun.
If you shoot once you are almost guaranteed not to get another shot on that same deer, it takes way longer for an archer to reload his bow then it would for a gunman to reload his gun for a second shot. That raises the challenge level so much more to put a good shot on it because there may not be that second chance. If using a bow you will agree that the challenge is so much great with a bow then it is with a gun. Although presented with all of this information one would think that bow hunting is the ultimate challenge. Have so much adrenaline you cant stop your body from shaking, the thrill of shooting something within 30 yards and gaining that different type of respect for that animal, and the challenge of getting that perfect shot on it because you know that there may not be another shot.
Gun control has two sole purposes, to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and to help save lives. Guns and crimes do not need to go hand in hand. Having a gun does not necessarily lead to a crime. Any person or group who is for gun control admits that although guns are dangerous, if restrictions are placed on getting a gun, guns do not need to lead to a crime. Having a mandatory waiting period to buy a gun is a perfect example.