Primitive Nature Of Man-A Human Rights Perspective

927 Words4 Pages
Sigmund Freud’s meticulous analysis of what inputs constitute human psychological development is founded on the fundamentals of, self-love, the need to be loved, the need for aggression, and external pressure to suppress primal desires and subscribe to the idea of “universal love”. Freud sees this as contradictory to the desire of primitive aggression, and if all love were equal then logically no favor could be shown to those, Freud asserts that the only legitimacy of the golden rule is its polarized contradiction to the true nature of man. (Freud: 66) An individuals Ego desires security, and the support of a group, in one dimension beings are afraid to disappoint those of authority, however, for individuals to completely fulfill internal needs and satisfy external critique individuals must repress confounding indicators, and transversely sublimate their frustration as love for authority. “It is the direct derivative of the conflict between the need for the authority’s love and the urge towards instinctual satisfaction, whose inhibitions produce the inclination to aggression.” (Freud: 100) Although Freud does not support the application of Eros to cultural development, it is undeniable that these Freudian models of decision-making can be applied on a larger scale where intrinsic desires of a group can proliferate an immoral conclusion. Similar to individuals’ frustration with an inability to make decisions that satisfy both internal and external critique, groups desire avenues to vent aggression. Specifically speaking of Genocide and Human Rights violations in Nazi Germany, Bosnia, Rwanda, and Guatemala. In Bosnia the state sponsored the systematic rape and impregnation of both Muslim and Serbian (mostly Muslim) women by opposing, in this case group leaders (on both sides of the conflict) literally provided its members with an outlet for sexual aggression while

More about Primitive Nature Of Man-A Human Rights Perspective

Open Document