Previous studies and comments on William Makepeace Thackeray and Vanity Fair:

710 Words3 Pages
It is not only accidental that William Makepeace Thackeray is given the title “The Prince of English Satirists”. His highly appreciated collection of literary works is an obvious proof for a social satirist whose writing ability has reached excellence. Through his pen, Thackeray reveals the hypocrisy in his age. Gently but profoundly, faithfully but keenly, exactly but surprisingly, that is the way Thackeray describes the society. Comparing Thackeray with his predecessors and contemporaries, Rollyson, C. states in “Notable British Novelists”: “Both in his miscellaneous writings and in his first great novel, Vanity Fair, Thackeray sought to counter the kind of melodramatic and pretentious entertainment provided by such authors as Edward Bulwer-Lytton, William Harrison Ainsworth, and even the early Charles Dickens. He attempted, instead, to make his readers see through the social and literary hypocrisy that, as he believed, characterized the age.” (Rollyson, 2001) “Thackeray’s work is thus truly homiletic, both in a literary and in an extraliterary sense. Unlike many of his predecessors, he examined in detail the difficulties occasioned not only by marriage but also by other personal relationships; rather than assuming that a novel should end with marriage, he makes it his subject.” (Rollyson, 2001) In addition, Rollyson expresses his opinion on Thackeray’s educative characteristic in his compositions: “Another one of the many senses in which Thackeray’s novels are educative is the way in which he redefines the word “gentleman” to apply not to a member of a particular social class, but rather to one who possesses a set of personal characteristics ,such as clear-sightedness, delicacy, generosity, and humanitarianism” (Rollyson, 2001) In the book “Companion to Victorian Novel”, Baker, W. and Womack, K. give the readers the knowledge of successful authors and
Open Document