But people still need to recognise we have an institutional responsibility to do oversight on the President” Garry Bass, Congress. This quote supports my view on the Congress being a watchdog. If the Congress is a lapdog, the President can have a free ride on running the country how he wishes and not represent the people’s view. However that is not the case as the President cannot do everything which pleases him. However, looking at the statistics such as Bill Clintons presidency, in the first 2 years which was a united government, Congress exercised limited oversight, and when needed to, asked softball questions, however , when Republicans took over Congress, things got much harder as they seek to hold the President to account, and after a while, impeach.
Chandra Lauderdale Short Paper 1 Govt. 2302 The main purpose of this chapter is to trace the expansion of presidential responsibilities and power, identify the many roles Presidents play, the functions filled by the President’s many advisers and helpers, the conflict between Presidents and Congress, and assesses how democratic the presidency is and whether presidents Respond to the public. The key questions that the author is addressing are, Does it strike you as odd that an era that produced some of our most respected presidents was in fact a time Of congressional dominance? Are there adequate checks in place
Although different in nature, congress and the President of the United States both hold positions of upmost power and unequivocally important decision-making for the American people. However, the argument always stands: who has more power? The power problem as it stands “...is the need to grant government enough power to effectively address the problems that people expect government to solve, while also limiting power so that it can be held accountable” (Katznelson, Kesselman, Draper, p.42). Far from perfect, the political system in place attempts to grant both Congress and The President exclusive and shared responsibilities to provide an equal spread of power. Upon founding of the United States government, not all three branches were to share the same amount of power.
These agencies have strong connections with Congress as it is Congress that authorizes their existence and finds the funds to finance them. Congressional committees must also oversee their operation. This acts as check on presidential power and a president who fails to influence his office with his goals will realize surely this. Therefore, the president has come to rely more on the specialized staff that work for him in the
Indecisive people can pass on their responsibilities and “pass the buck,” and advisory people can propose their concepts and lobby for acceptance, but the President can ultimately turn to nobody else. Presidents must make the hard decisions. It is a heavy mantle to bear on those presidential shoulders. It is lonely at the top. President Johnson’s “wise men” possessed depth in their areas of expertise beyond that of the President, who was a master mover of legislation to accomplish domestic social programs but very much out of his league in military matters and international relations.
But in reality, especially in the “domain of foreign affairs”…the central legal issues rarely come before the Court at all. The law is effectively settled within the executive branch or by the informal agreements between the president and Congress” (Caplan 21). The other branches of government are aware of the overuse of presidential power but do not know how to address the issue to somehow resolve or better the situation. Too much executive power could lead to the abolishment or stacking of Congress, the judiciary system, the House and the Senate. By doing this it would lead the democracy to a dictatorship.
Discuss presidentialism in Latin America. Describe how powerful presidents might be seen as something “natural” to Latin America, and how they might be the result of institutional design. Presidentialism in Latin America Latin American Politics Christopher Fausti University of North Georgia The political institution of presidentialism within Latin American countries differentiates the political ideology of democracy in various ways concerning the balance of power between different sectors of the government. Even though political institutions provide important necessities for implementing representation, the principles concerning the background of institutions are not clear on terms regarding the separation of powers through the different branches of government. Due to the degradation of various economies throughout Latin America during the previous decade and the failed attempt to improve economic conditions with the implementation of autocratic rule, the transition to democracy began to worsen the economies surrounding Latin American countries.
With reference to the source, describe two limitations on prime ministerial power. (5 marks) Prime ministerial power has strengths as well as limitations. One of the limitations to prime ministerial power is that the members of cabinet may turn against the Prime Minister, as happened in 1990 to Margaret Thatcher. The cabinet’s support for the prime minister is conditional on the prime minister being popular and successful. If he is not successful or popular, he will not have the cabinet’s support, making it harder for him to control the cabinet, therefore making his job as prime minister harder.
|Essay Topic | |For new democracies in the developing world, which system— | |presidentialism or parliamentarism— is more likely to ensure political | |stability? Why? And do we have a universal answer for all countries? | Introduction According to Mahler (2008), the presidential system and the parliamentary system are the most popular approaches to the executive institutions that can be found in political systems around the world. Those studying Comparative Politics have always been keen on finding out whether the presidential or parliamentary form of government is more conducive to a stable government and democracy.
However, the downside is that some social problems, including some urgent ones, can be unresolved for a long period of time as arguments shuffle between the legislature and the executive. On the other hand, the separation of power between the legislature and executive in parliamentarism is less clear due to the overlapping of personnel in the two institutions. The legislative initiatives of the government can be easily passed owing to the presence of a central link, in which the prime minister is both the chief executive of the government and the leader of the majority party at the same time. A strong party discipline ensures