Most people shudder at the thought or sight of a Pit Bull and consider them vicious atrocities, but I will show that Pit Bulls are innocent and really are just misunderstood. I would like to give some facts, dispel some myths, and show the side of the breed that the media chooses not to tell. American Pit Bull Terriers were first introduced during World War I and World War II. The job of the Pit Bull was to deliver messages back and forth across the battlefield. Pit Bulls were first bred to bait bulls and bears as a sport back in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but soon became more commonly used as house pets due to their friendliness towards people (Brom, 1987-09, p.14).
The lack of consequences in the movies leads to deliberate, heinous crimes in which the perpetrator thinks he can get away with his actions. Movies, however, have many fictional twists to gain excitement and attention. One may argue, movies also show talking animals. If the lack of consequences is taken as truth then so should the fictitious talking animals, assuming the movie is at fault. The picking and choosing of what in movies causes a false sense of reality is a flawed thesis.
It may not do any harm, but on the other hand, it may.” This shows the dangerous factor of the food. This can relate back to Frankenstein, for he doesn’t want to create another monster because of the harm it could do or not do. He doesn’t want to take that chance of a mistake again. This relates back to the theme of the dangerous curiosity if knowledge. In the second article, Fox News states that they wont know the effect it will have on the animals and society, “…many individuals have qualms about
In O’Brien’s ‘How To Tell A True War Story’, the story he tells us about Rat Kiley shooting the baby water buffalo both disturbs and intrigues. The act itself is without a doubt horrific, but it does not elicit a response of disgust. The question itself remains however, why did he shoot the buffalo in the first place? Rat’s actions were not random, pointless cruelty, but are in fact indicative of a much deeper, more complex emotional state. We must eliminate several more obvious answers first, but we can find that Rat Kiley is trying to reconcile what he is feeling with the situation he finds himself in.
Such violence is really only the cause of Roy’s pain, his emotions controlling his actions conflicts with our prejudice. Frankenstein's Monster's anguish comes from the rejection he feels from society “Am I to be thought the only criminal, when all human kind sinned against me?”. Posing this Rhetorical question highlights the Irony of how the monster while innocent has been judged just as the reader has. Influenced by her father Mary Shelley's story of a monster portrays the idea that to be human goes beyond that of the body. The Monsters vulgarity and the Replicants perfection does not define them their reaction and action and the ability to think morally and ethically makes them human.
Yes, he did kill a beast that avenged a whole town, but that is no reason to cut an arm off as a trophy. This is a disgraceful move because it just shows how conceited Beowulf is. Beowulf liked the attention. He intentionally looked for attention. A true hero does not take all the pride in a heroic act instead a hero should be humble not cocky.
This causes Victor to go into an extreme depression and eventually causes him to also go after the monster with a vengeance, allowing him to cross paths with Walton. Victor’s selfishness does not cease despite his health degrading in the novel. Instead of turning around, and leaving the situation, Victor is determined to keep going. The reason Victor is the monster is because he has no respect for the monster as a sentient being and only seems to care about himself. He is the prime example of a character that is easy to sympathize with or feel sorry for; however, the monster deserves a lot more sympathy than Victor does.
In addition to pathos he says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”, this an example of pathos because he shows love to Caesar and Rome. This part is effective because he makes tells the citizens that he did it for Rome and makes them feel that he loved them. He also says that if he had offended anyone that they should use the knife they used to kill Caesar and go with him, this is pathos because it creates fear of Brutus among the people. This is effective because he makes the citizens fear that if they disagree they should die too. Furthermore he says “who here is so rude that will not be a
But, this question may be explained differently. When Pi asks this question, it suggests that he realizes that the story of the animals must be an illusion created by him. He then also realizes that this illusion is not a bad one. It has allowed him to survive an ordeal that could have very easily killed him. This acknowledgment suggests that somewhere deep inside he accepts the story with the people is true, but it does not matter.
As soon as he sees the creature he has created he feels dissapointed and repelled so he abandons the creature. A monster can often be described as a fearful repugnant creature who may produce physical harm or mental fear by either its appearance or its actions. ''The creature'' in Frankenstein is often considered the only monster of the story, and this is mostly because of its appearance but in fact both man and creature can be called monsters. Although Frankenstein's creature is hideous all he is looking for is companionship. He didn’t want to harm anyone but the circumstances and the way people treated him forced him to appear as a monster.