Prescriptive Accounting Theory Vs. Normative Accounting Practice

695 Words3 Pages
Positive accounting theories are more beneficial to accounting practice than normative accounting theories Accounting theories provide a foundation of knowledge, understanding and guidelines for practices. However it is important to hold a clear understanding of the focus and purpose of different accounting theories if they are to be utilized effectively. Two primary accounting theories which provide a basis for understanding the how and the why of accounting practices are positive accounting theory and normative accounting theories. The function, application and the benefit of these two theories will be considered to determine which is the more beneficial in regard to accounting practice. “Positive accounting is the branch of academic…show more content…
669)…. as, “a prescriptive theory that is stated in terms of what should occur in order to achieve the theory’s objective. Normative accounting theories prescribe the correct way to account”. The normative approach to accounting theory is primarily concerned with developing theories that prescribe what should happen, rather then developing theories that prescribe what actually happened (Godfrey et al., 2006 p6). The conceptual framework is a dominate form of normative accounting theory and Godfrey, et. al (2006, p. 412) dictate a conceptual framework in the context of financial accounting as “a definitive statement of the nature and purpose of financial accounting and reporting and which provides guidance for all accounting practice”. The Financial Accounting Standards Boards believes a conceptual framework to be integral as it adds a level of rigor and discipline that will result in more consistency in final statements and general modes of practice (The Financial Accounting Standards Board (2001). The primary function of this framework is to provide agreed standards, to remove the ambiguity and personalisation of the decision making process. Hence a conceptual framework is a firm example of normative accounting theory as it is prescriptive, detailing how practices should…show more content…
Both approaches to accounting theory are valuable measures and when used aptly can combine to give a comprehensive understanding of a given situation. In essence, positive accounting theory is concerned with the reality of practices while normative accounting theory is concerned with strict guidelines for how practices should occur in an ideal environment. While a normative approach provides structure and a basis for how accounting practices should occur, reality involves individuals and therefore behaviour must be considered. The positive accounting theory allows for understanding of how behaviour impacts practices and the decision making process. Positive accounting practice is explanatory and reflective and hence can provide an insight into the reality of accounting practices. This information can in turn be utilized by normative approaches as a foundation for regulating and improving accounting practices. Therefore understanding the purpose of both theories, their application individually and collaboratively will lead to the enhancement of accounting systems as a

More about Prescriptive Accounting Theory Vs. Normative Accounting Practice

Open Document