However, even with all the differences, both empires managed to keep their territories protected, organized, and civilized. The political differences amongst Han China and Imperial Rome were based off their ways of life. In China, the idealistic philosophy on how to live was Confucianism; it is what kept order in the hierarchy. People in China followed this, thus keeping everyone doing what they were supposed to and maintaining balance. Because this philosophy was connected with divinity from nature, China managed to maintain stable control politically.
Confucianism is highly advocated in China. In stead of saying Confucianism is a religion, I think Confucianism is concepts of state of moral idea. It provided spiritual and intellectual knowledge to the Chinese. It taught us to be self-ruled and to be virtuous person. The Chinese believed it is a virtue to follow Confucianism.
The essence of this form of nationalism is to promote national interest. The idea of this form of nationalism is based in the nation’s patriotism and the willingness of its citizens to associate the nation with the state political position. In this case the state becomes more representative of its citizens will and also promotes loyalty amongst the citizens towards the state. In order to make account of whether we are living in the world of nations or in the world of states one would distinguish between the state and the nation. There has been a great misuse of these two concepts as interchangeable or a synonyms of one another whereas there are fundamental differences between these two
The Democratic-Republicans sought to limit federal control and preferred local power as the dominant force. Chiefly, the emergence of the American two-party system arose from strongly opposed political views, but also developed out of experience and a struggle for power. As previously stated, the main reason for the development of the party system in the United States, or any political party for that matter, is a difference in beliefs on how a government should be operated. The Federalists, formed by Alexander Hamilton – Washington’s Treasury Secretary – in 1794, favored federalism with government having the power to control commerce, tax, declare war, and make treaties among other powers.
Nature and ancestor spirits are common in popular Taoism. Organized Taoism distinguishes its ritual activity from that of the folk religion, which some professional Taoists view as wrong. Confucianism is a Chinese ethical and philosophical system originally developed from the teachings of Confucius. Confucius was the founder of the teachings of Confucianism. Confucianism is a complex system of moral, social, political, philosophical, and religious thought which has had big influence on the culture and history of East Asia.
Van Evera focused on how there were numerous factors, such as structural, political/environmental, and perceptual factors in which nationalism was a main cause of war. I believe that this article is the more accurate of the two articles, and this is because he is able to take the constructivist/ideological views that Suny uses, and incorporate them into his article, and rather than only explaining to the reader the political and historical ideologies that a nation may have. Van Evera also explicates his hypotheses by explaining that although there are constructivist ideologies such as: mythical beliefs, like self-glorification,
The amazing closeness yet separateness of these advanced civilizations can be expressed in a number of different ways. One of those similarities is that emperors used their religion to justify their power. An economic difference between Mesopotamia and China is China’s smaller scale cultural diffusion because of natural barricades making it a difficult place to reach. These two factors express the ways in which China and Mesopotamia are similar yet different politically, economically, religiously, and
The Mandate of Heaven provided not only China, but also other parts of the world with a dynastic system. This is because it provides a non-chaotic way of deciding another ruling family of a government. It would be fair for everyone because the heavenly powers would pick the ruling family that they feel is the most deserved candidate for that spot. The Mandate of Heaven philosophy would be
The participation in the dominant culture and the preservation of one’s own ethnic heritage according to Cultural Pluralism benefits the U.S. democratic development because the immigrants can behave and share their cultures while participate other cultures; besides, it promotes commercial development which helps the economic growth. According to “Ethnic Identity and Majority Culture,” Milton Gordon claims that Unites States is not only being “a cooperation of cultural diversities,” but also “a federation or commonwealth of national cultures.” This quote implies that the United States respect every culture and let everyone share their own culture. As a result, immigrants blend into this society with their original cultures. Moreover, they learn and absorb other different cultures while preserve their own culture. These will make new immigrants believe that America will not meddle with their freedom of learning and behaving different cultures, because America is a democratic country.
A basic dictionary will give you a mundane defintion: “the ethnic, gender, racial, and socioeconomic variety in a situation, institution, or group.1” However, for more of a relevant application, and a more simplisitic approach, would be to define cultural diversity as, “nothing more than a difference from the majority. In any culture there is a majority and many minorities. Culture is a set of norms that set standards for a society of what is acceptable behavior.2” This can also be labeled as multi-culturalism, and it is founded on the presumption that each culture’s identity needs to preserved, not discarded or ignored. The pre-eminent example of cultural diversity in action can best be seen in the United States, where we pride ourselves on being a “salad bowl,” where we embrace our national identity, but we don’t want to forget aspects of our past identities as well. Thus we call ourselves “American,” but we also like to