a. Receiving a zero for the course b. Having a college degree revoked after the fact c. Being sued by the author of the plagiarized, original work That's Correct! Almost anything can happen to plagiarists; the outcome is usually very negative. While there is no guarantee of getting caught, plagiarists ultimately hurt themselves by not learning to write skillfully or think independently.
This is extremely important as it relates to competitive advantage and non public information. Another example is inappropriate or offensive behavior. Management does not want the names of those offended being released for fear of backlash, and or other employees attempting to torture or harass those individuals. From an employee perspective, it is often difficult to grasp being dismissed from a job without a reason being provided. Most of the time employees are left wondering what happened.
This happens more often than not, because the local ITT Tech campus is understaffed and is attempting to continue to offer classes as advertised . This is not to say that these instructors are all uneducated in other fields, but are not qualified to teach a specific course requested of them as a “fill in”. Some instructors do not realize the potential damage of their actions, but instead see only the monetary compensation for their time. This leaves students frustrated with the lack of useful information learned and bitter for having their time and money wasted because of the poor management of ITT Tech . In closing, ITT Technical Institute is clouding Information Technology field with unqualified graduates by giving students a false sense of security, burying students in debt, and hindering the learning potential of students by employing instructors who are often unqualified to teach the curriculum.
Micromanagement like this puts employees in a threatened state and unable to perform their best. Additionally, while the reward system may have appeared functional, it ultimately was very poorly designed. Employees felt incentivized to simply “impress” their superiors, which did not necessarily correlate with actual performance. Further, the assessment cloaked evaluations as a part of career development counseling, creating a conflict of interest for the auditor collecting performance information from the employees. Finally, the evaluation system failed to require managers to provide feedback to their reports, inhibiting an environment of learning or growth.
For example, some people that have public work may always have arguments with citizens or colleagues without a clear reason. Besides, sometimes authorities do not face the problems or necessities some workers have. - GOOD To round off, violence in the workplace is a problem that every day develops without fear every day. The society the community live in and the dissatisfaction some people may have with their job are some factors involved. Unfortunately, is seems to have no end, even though human beings should try to get on well with the world they live in.
Conflict arises from a clash of perceptions, goals, or values in an arena where people care about the outcome. Confusion can cause conflict because individuals in the organization want to achieve their own personal goals while also working with others to achieve the common mission of the organization. Conflict can be helpful in making necessary changes within the home or work environment. However, unresolved conflict can result in feelings of dissatisfaction, unhappiness, hopelessness, depression, and other emotions. Most conflicts in the workplace can lead to a lot of negative situations, such as being permanently dismissed from your job, work productivity can decrease, it can also increase absenteeism (which is having numerous absences from your job) and sometimes could even result in violence or serious crimes.
I recently observed a scenario that is much too prevalent in today’s workplace or institutions. This practice has become so ritualistic that it is technically an unwritten rule. One that most people do not even dare question either for fear of repercussion from either supervisor or colleagues or simply to appear to be in accordance with the environment culture. It is an evil that is often used along side the ideology of “for the good of everyone.” That is what most of us knows as the “sin of familiarity.” Most supervisors and his/her employment staff are more likely to hire someone whom they know over someone they have nor heard of or met. In some cases the have no reason to doubt someone else’s recommendations whom they also know well rather than taking the risk of hiring someone they never heard of but may be equally or better qualified to do the job.
Constructive discharge would apply if the company implemented a change that is so intolerable a reasonable employee is forced to quit or resign, that company would be guilty of illegally firing the employee. Constructive discharge is not relative in this case for these reasons: * Although the change was recent it was not so intolerable that the employee
Even changing their route to work is cause enough to be arrested for thoughtcrime. While some things were obvious, such as not participating in the Two Minutes Hate, other things were not so clearcut, such as facial expressions. Who is committing thoughtcrime? How do you know? We all know that you can't tell.
But it becomes wrong when you are selling your products at such a low price that you put all other companies out of business. When you are using this form of dumping, you put people out of work because their company can no longer afford to keep them on. Either way I don’t see any moral reasoning that would support dumping products overseas if it’s illegal. First you are breaking a law that has been setup to protect people. You are also intentionally causing harm to others, if you follow either definition.