What can the reader infer about the speaker or the speaker’s attitude from the word choice, and how does it connect to tone? When analyzing syntax, consider such questions as: Are the sentences simple and direct, or complex and convoluted? How do dependent clauses relate to main clauses? Does the author use repetition or parallel structure for emphasis? Does the author write periodic or cumulative sentences?
Here are the things I look for when I'm annotating: a. Literary devices-similes, metaphors, personification, foreshadowing, symbols, hyperbole. Note the device and-- most important--the effect the device has. Connotations-The ideas that words or phrases create in your mind, beyond their dictionary definition. Details-What impression do they make on you?
Belonging to a group or community can provide opportunities and disappointments. To what extent do the texts you have studies support this idea? 3. Belonging is a struggle. 4.
Their discussion may be TOO GENERAL. They may even misunderstand some aspects of the literary work(s). These essays are adequately written but may demonstrate inconsistent control over the elements of effective writing. Organization is evident, but it may not be fully realized or particularly coherent. C- (2-3): These essays address the main ideas involved in the question/topic, but they do so inaccurately or without the support of APPROPRIATE TEXTUAL EVIDENCE.
* A description of the intended audience. B. The rhetorical précis is an effective note taking strategy because * It answers the basic who, what, where, when, how, why, and to whom about a piece of writing. It also summarizes the content and analyzes the circumstances leading up to and informing a piece of writing. It clarifies how someone else chose to say something, in a particular way, for some purpose, to certain other people.
Set the passage off in quotes, or indent it if it is longer than a line or two of text. c. Choose a sentence, phrase, or passage that reiterates what you stated previously That's Correct! Citing the source and page number and setting the passage off in quotes (or indenting it if it is longer than a line or two of text) are requirements for including verbatim information from an outside source. Question 2: Which of the following is a potential consequence of plagiarism? a.
Attention getting sentence 1. Something that will grab the readers attention B. Background information on the topic or question. (date, place, situation surrounding the issue or question) C. Definition of terms contained within the question D. Thesis and roadmap of what the essay will be about II. BODY PARAGRAPH #1 (Reason one) A. Sub Thesis: 1.
This article also brought up an interesting question stating “Do translators imbue their work with temporal signifiers, those that don't stand out as readily as "dude"?” This question brings about the question of whether the responsibility of interpreting these terms should be put on the reader or the translator. Another interesting point I read in this article is about how difficult it is translating from
Language imase voice structure and mood. as well as considering how you see the text overall, you must also consider in depth the connections between the passages and parts of the text. Does this passage remind you of or parallel other moments or aspect of the text such as images, charecter development, plot or language? How? does the passage reflect a shift or change in such aspects of the text as charact/s plot language or images?
1. Give the author’s “more formal” definition of thinking. What page(s) in the text did you find the answer on? Thinking is any mental activity that helps formulate or solve a problem, make a decision, or fulfill a desire to understand. It is a searching for answers, a reaching for meaning.