Paternalism In The Tempest

755 Words4 Pages
The theme of paternalism resonates in The Tempest through Shakespeare’s vivid portrayal of the protagonist Prospero exercising authority and control over various characters in the play, specifically Miranda, Caliban and Ferdinand, like a puppeteer over his subjects in hopes of achieving what he believes to be the best outcome. Such manipulation is the very essence of Prospero in The Tempest as he deftly maneuvers his subjects so as to fulfill his penultimate goal in the final scene - to restore his political might which he lost to Antonio who underhandedly usurped his throne twelve years ago. We see the prominence of paternalism displayed in Act 1 Scene 2 where Prospero engages his daughter in a conversation about the circumstances which led to their current state. He starts off the discourse very patiently as a father would to his beloved daughter, asking her tenderly if she remembers “A time before we (they) came unto this cell”. He goes on to ask her if she recalls “any other house or person” to which Miranda replies that her memory is hazy. All seems normal so far, as what one would expect from a father-daughter conversation. However, during the course of the conversation, the tone of Prospero seems to change as he repeatedly asserts his command over Miranda. This is evident from his queries of “Dost thou attend me?” or “Dost thou hear?”, despite the fact that she seems almost spellbounded by his chronological account as seen from her various replies - “Sir, most heedfully” and “Your tale, Sir, would cure deafness”. In his recounting of the past, Prospero seems to be leading the innocent Miranda to the main reason why he cast the Tempest - to reel his enemies in from afar and have them “Brought to this shore”. A point to note is how he waits for twelve long years before he divulges to Miranda the history of what transpired in his kingdom, which begs the
Open Document