Monasteries were destroyed, their contents and wealth confiscated (& given to the king ) & those who opposed this were hanged. Henry did this to try to reduce the power of the pope. At the time Henry thought he was right to do this. However, many people opposed Henry’s actions due to there religious beliefs. Looking back it is clear there was evidence supporting & opposing the decision to close the monasteries.
Give some examples. A relationship is a logical connection b/t records form two or more tables. All relationships can be categorized as one-to-one, one-to-many, or many-to-many. (e.g., a customer places orders; an employee has dependents; and e.t.c) 3. What is an attribute?
DVR Tutorial Question 2 Case Study : Taking Responsibility – Union Carbide and Bhopal disaster 1) Does the corporation owe its first loyalty and moral responsibility to the financial interests of its owners or the local community and its employees who are affected by its operations ? The corporation does owe a bit of its responsibility to the financial interests of its owners but it owes its first loyalty to the local community and its employees . This was not shown because Union Carbide US didn’t want to take responsibility . In seeking to assign responsibility for the incident ,pressure from the corporate office to stop losses backed Union Carbide India into a corner that led to the cost-cutting proposal to slack off on safety measures that ultimately produced the disaster. As Milton Friedman said, the social responsibility of a business is to increase profits, then Union Carbide Corporation’s decision to approve the cost-cutting plan seems appropriate and acceptable.
However, analyst and experts present that Hill Country’s excess liquidity with zero debt is going to lose benefit and fail to maximize the shareholder value. Risk may be hided in the steady company’s good performance. Pending retirement of CEO is one of risks. ii) Briefly discuss the current corporate culture Hill Country was a well-managed company with decisions which can make shareholder value. CEO and other management insiders also held a significant proportion of company’s common stock.
This choice was made to benefit themselves at the expense of the 21,000 employees that lost their jobs and the numerous other stakeholders that suffered financial losses. Sometimes using the Utilitarian Rule to decide if an act is ethical or not is difficult because it can be hard to decide if the severe harm of a few is worth the moderate benefit of all others. In this case, however, I believe it is very clear that the harm of the majority was much greater than the benefit of the few executives. Another ethical rule that you could apply to this case is the Moral Rights Rule. The Moral Rights Rule defines a decision as ethical if it protects people’s fundamental rights.
However, the opposing side was strongly worried that the United States government was going to have a loss of power. The opposing side had a goal to make the debate drug out as long as possible, by having long speeches about how the Bill angered them. Barry Goldwater stated that he believed that the United States government should not get involved in the employment area because there is “no constitutional basis for the exercise of federal regulatory.” Also stated in this selection Senator Sam Ervin says that it would ruin the relationships with the state and the federal government. Last but not least Senator John Stennis pointed out mainly that citizens should be able to their own businesses or property as that wished upon. (Source 6) Filibusters was another main event that took part in of the passing of the bill.
One of them offers him some kickbacks if he gives that firm the bid, but ultimately, it is up to his boss to decide on the company. He doesn’t mention the incentive, but he pushes his boss to give the bid to the company that offered him the kickback. 1. Do you think Bill’s withholding the truth as bad as lying? 2.
The financial being of a corporation starts with shares. Few companies operate with the philosophy of losing money. With that in mind, I believe the shareholders will always be taken care of. However, corporations also need to look at their footprint on the world. I feel that society is steering away from operating purely to make a profit.
B. Offer an overview of the position in your words. IV. Compare and Contrast the two positions. A.
George Keyworth was not a ethical person because he leaked confidential information and also let a investigation be opened, instead of being honest. CEO Dunn showed an ethical attitude and was forced to resign by board members, which describes the other board members to be unethical also. 2. Who are the stakeholders impacted by this situation? How would you rank their claims? Everyone related to this company is affected by this situation.