Parnell's Leadership of the Home Rule Movement

1861 Words8 Pages
Assess Parnell’s leadership of the Home Rule Movement In 1891 Charles Stewart Parnell died in Brighton in the arms of his then wife Katherine Parnell. Parnell had been a politician since 1875. He began his political career as an MP representing the county Meath. He steadily rose to prominence in the ensuing years, first becoming the leader of the Home Rule Confederation of Great Britain, then as the President of the Irish Land League before finally taking his place as the leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party. Parnell’s main goal throughout his career was to achieve Home Rule in Ireland. Although, ultimately he never did achieve this, he did contribute greatly towards making the possibility a tangible reality; in the words of W.H. Gladstone Parnell had “set Home Rule on its legs”. Parnell’s leadership of the Home Rule movement was a fundamental part of its relative success at the time. Parnell was viewed by some to be a difficult and egotistical man: “the legendary frigidity of demeanour, the impenetrable reserve, the lofty detachments, the sphinx like silences, the hint of steel”. Another description is just as unflattering: “He kept his colleagues at arm’s length with uncompromising roughness not excelled by the Czar of Russia or the emperor of Germany in dealing with their subordinates.” Although these are traits that would not be greatly sought after for a friendship, they are not entirely without merit when employed by a leader. Any faults in character would only become a problem if they were to threaten the goals of the party, unfortunately this did turn out to be the case in the end. After Parnell’s affair with Kitty O’Shea was made public knowledge Gladstone made it very clear that he would not be able to work with the Irish Parliamentary Party as long as Parnell was in charge. Gladstone “made up his mind to publish his letter to Morley immediately. By
Open Document