A great man, really, in charge of having possibly the biggest oil refinery company in the world. John Rockefeller gave $506,816,041.18 to various Baptist churches and missionaries, education boards, universities, and foundations before he died in 1937. The greatest act of generosity by this man, but what does this really mean? Rockefeller actually used these donations to improve their image and to have their name live on forever. This only leads one to believe how dangerous a man with so much power can be.
Wolters believed that Speer only tried to protect his reputation, that he was trying to build himself up systematically & that he was a hypocrite who was far from apolitical. Dan van der Vat further supports Wolters, and says “the only reason Speer escaped the death penalty was because he was a good liar”. Matthias Schmidt, author of ‘The end of a Myth’, believed that Speer had the motive to become a great historical figure, and attempted to do so by gaining power in the Nazi party I agree with Wolters, Dan van der Vat and Matthias Schmidt, with saying Speer was only interested in his reputation. That he was a megalomaniac architect who had established what Schmidt said was a “cunning apologia”, and had therefore escaped execution at Nuremburg. Although, due to Gitta Serenys studies, we can sympathize.
Even though Schindler was a German, he was very fond of his Jew workers. In order to save his Jew friends, which he referred to as “my children” he had to bribe the SS. He continuously paid the Nazis large sums of money so that his Jews could have better water food among other things; he did this gladly with no complain whatsoever about his workers. “I was now resolved to do everything in my power to defeat the system.”- Oskar Schindler. What he meant in this was that he
The Danger of the Ordinary In Ordinary Men, the author Christopher Browning asserts that the members of the Nazi Police Battalion 101 were ordinary men prior to becoming the ruthless killers that fueled the violent extermination of the Jews. This assertion is frightening because if true, people like us, which believe such actions to be only possible by abnormal men, are made no different than the Nazis and repeats of such horrific events are made less unfathomable. The closest way to test such hypothetical assertions is through social experimentation, in which volunteers go through experiments that emulate the respective situations being recreated. Through the analysis of two psychological studies, Stanley Milgram’s experiment in 1961 and
Who was this Oscar Schindler who started by earning millions of German marks through exploitation of slave workers and ended by spending his last pfennig and risking his life to save "his" 1,200 Schindler Jews from Hitler´s death camps? Oscar Schindler was born on April 28th, 1908, in Zwittau in Czechoslovakia in a home imbued with his parents` deep piety. The nearest neighbours were a Jewish Rabbi family, and the two sons became Oscar`s best friends. The family was one of the richest and most prominent in Zwittau, but as a result of the deep economic depression of the 1930s, the family firm became bankrupt Oscar Schindler quickly got on good terms with the local Gestapo chiefs and rejoices here over life in the beginning of the 1940s - he was a womanisor and heavy drinker, but continually risked his life to save his Schindler Jews from the deathcamps. Schindler was recruited by the German Intelligence Agency to collect information about Poles and was highly esteemed for his efforts - a fact that was to play a decisive role later in the war for Schindler, when he needed all his
Therefore, Jerry made the next best decision - running the boys into the ditch to stop the harassment. Mr. Benedict happens to be a quick and mature thinker, which he demonstrated in the last paragraph of the story. Speaking to Fran, he told her “I just figured that if they wouldn’t run me off the first time, they wouldn’t do it the second, either.” He took a calculated risk to ensure their safety, and succeeded in keeping them both out of harm’s way. The last justification of my thesis is how he maintained a level headed and calm demeanor in spite of being dangerously threatened. Again, speaking to Fran in the last paragraph, “I’ll
He also performed these good deeds knowing that it won’t benefit him at all which shows us his heroic characteristics such as being brave and courages. Furthermore, I support Greeley’s claims because he considered including all of the wrongdoings in Brown’s felony while praising Brown’s brave attempt to get rid of slavery so both slavery supporters and abolitionists can relate to his position. On the other hand, Abraham
The picture of innocence, walking among the worst evil in the world. It is after he saw this and the conditions that the Jews were living in that he began to take in more and more Jews that weren’t necessarily making him money, but because he was trying to save them. I believe that half the reason for Shindler’s change of heart is because of his accountant Itzhak Stern. He convinced Shindler that saving even those who weren’t “essential” to his business or to him making a profit was the right thing to do. At the end of the movie, all of his Jewish workers make Shindler a ring as a thank you for everything he has done for them.
2). In other words, Sharp and Cartwright believe that even though many people were aware that something catastrophic was occurring, they still did nothing to prevent it; moreover, the acts of “nothing” has given a greater advantage towards the spread of genocide. Sharp and Cartwright’s theory that the spread of genocide is due to inaction is extremely useful because it shreds insight into the difficult problem of the genocide dissemination. Similar to Sharp and Cartwright’s theory, Elie Wiesel, a concentration camp prisoner from the Holocaust of World War II, mentions his memories in Buna, a concentration camp where he was imprisoned with his father; moreover, he notes that several times within a
The Germans’ interests are to obey Nazis orders so they would not have to be at fault for being against the laws of Hitler. Few Germans weren’t for the Holocaust and the extermination of the Jews, but most of Germanys population were. They just went along what they were told to do. The Jews interests are to live and get away from the Nazi rule. The other actors that are responding to the Milgram Experiment are : The learner, the teacher, and the person who is conducting the experiment.