1. How would you define “Frozen Preferences” and what is the impact of this concept on strategy formulation, alternative analysis and recommendation? • Managers don’t like to make major strategic changes once decisions have been made (except in the case of overwhelming evidence) as they will look unprepared and ineffective and their creditability is damaged • Frozen preferences o Management has made a decision and over time analysis shows that their decision may not be the best choice o However they feel compelled to maintain their current strategy even if it is not the best course of action. • As management preferences becomes a larger part of the organization (personnel changes, budgets etc), it becomes more and more difficult to change direction. o A tendency to avoid reversing changes even if it was not the best choice o In reality, past expenditures are sunk costs and the organization should use a clean slate to look at new choices, but to the manager, this will come at great personal loss.
This will save time in the long run, which should encourage most employees despite their initial frustration with the management system change. A series of training and preparation with individualized tutorials might mitigate some anticipated resistance. Inadequate communication may also cause resistance. Management will make the major decisions with regard to the scheduled change; it is their obligation to clarify these decisions to subordinates within the company. Management is also expected to properly handle the inevitable questions and grievances; it is important to avoid misinterpretation regarding the procedural
Decision making with your employees will let them gain respect for the leader and become more determined. This style will bring strength between you and your employees. Laissez-Faire-This style is used when the leader is lazy or distracted, it’s more of a you do what you want style. This style can be used when the team is highly capable and motivated, it’s when the team doesn’t need close monitoring or supervision. This style can cause failure when the leader expects the group to make the decision between themselves when they are un sure about what they need to achieve and how they need to accomplish the task.
There can be many | | |to occur had to increase, or the forces that want |reasons for resistance. People become | | |things to stay the same had to decrease. Once the|very accustomed to and comfortable with | | |forces are determined and understood, the process |their ways of accomplishing tasks. Also,| | |of implementing change can occur. Lewin divided |employees may resist because they don’t | | |the process of change into
Criticisms from supervisors and peers often are met with emotional listening resistance. We hear only the negatives and do not attend to offers of help or ways to improve our performance. We are over stimulated and do not accurately receive messages that could help us grow and develop. Barrier Three: Criticizing Personal Style Rather Than Messages. We often find ourselves criticizing the way a message is presented and ignoring its content or value.
This occurs when team members are reluctant to be vulnerable with one another and are unwilling to admit their mistakes, weaknesses, or needs for help. Team members need to be comfortable with each other and enjoy each other’s company together. Without a certain comfort level among team members a foundation of trust is impossible. Trust is the foundation of team work, in order for this to work for your team members must be comfortable challenging each other. Members must overcome the need to protect themselves.
We need an option, and being optimistic may give us false promises or facades to see one thing and create inability to be resilient with the other available options. Being realistic is also applicable in our relationships. When relating to people, we can always see good things within our friends, yet similar to all things, humans are not perfect. The realistic outlook can help us understand human imperfection and not overestimate the relationship so that it can’t let us as down as not being able to move on at all. There are cases where our loved ones pass away or they are far away from us.
I don’t interconnect with my pledge brothers how I should. These are the reasons why. Opening myself up to people become difficult at times. When I am inside of a new environment it takes me time to warm up and allow people to see the true me. My reasoning is because most don’t understand me, and they take my demeanor as cockiness.
In this age of competitive business, managing change is a huge factor which determines success or failure of an organization. It seems to be that managing change may affect with various change of the organization such as complexity of work processes, cost structures, communication protocols, work environment, employee engagement. It is predictable that change is a sort of challenge. It might be brought risks and disorder into the organization. However, it is widely fulfilled in real world due to its importance and managing change is constantly considered by management theorists, practitioners and business firms.According to Palmer, Dunford& Akin (2009),there are two key images of managing which are management as controlling and management as shaping added to that there are three core images in terms of change outcomes which are intended, partially intended and unintended.
In the given case study; the aim is to propose an apt change model for Plasticast keeping in mind the areas of improvement in terms of practices and procedures followed by the company. Considering the active hurdles faced by Plasticast i.e restructuring styles, frequent change in top-level management and improper recruitment effects, the change agent would like to propose a soft approach model of change. The change management strategy defines the approach needed to manage change in any given situation in an organisation. Before implementing any change in the organisation you must understand the past, present and future implications of the industry. To answer this one must analyse the causes for the changes required and how the implementation of these changes can affect the performance of the organisation and the challenges faced during the change period.