In simpler language, it means to aim for perfection. On the surface, it sounds nice, but all this ignores the basic human trait, the one shared across cultures, languages, and races: imperfection. To be human is to be errant. Thus, the dreams of idealists often get dashed and projects they attempt often end either in failure or at least "less than they could have been." On the other hand, realism means "the inclination towards literal truth and pragmatism" (ibid).
This is known as the “Character Ethic”. In the long term, it is easier to be motivated by such principles of integrity and goodness. Your character should not be based on a false public image, hypocritical attitudes and behaviors, or superficial techniques for human interaction/manipulation. That would be known as the “Personality Ethic”. If your principles were based solely on the “Personality Ethic”, you may achieve short-term success, but people will eventually see through your dishonest motives and cease to trust you.
Then, Self-defeating problems such as poor time management skills, indecisiveness, difficulty concentrating, and perfectionism can be major contributors to a lack of motivation. It's important to clarify your goals and then work to
The two virtues, certainty and doubt are very controversial. The doubt somebody has can cloud their judement but it can also guide them in making a better decision. On the other hand, certainty can blind someone from seeing their true colors of something. In our modern society, doubt is looked down upon; or viewed as a negative idea. Doubt doesnt always contradict certainty, but instead somewhere in between.
Timothy M Fuller Good Life Essay # 3 Prompt: Suppose for the sake of the argument that acquiring knowledge usually makes people better off, at least in the long run. Some people might conclude from this that knowledge is a basic good—that every instance of knowledge is basically good (for the person who possesses it) precisely because it is an instance of knowledge. How might a hedonist argue that knowledge is not a basic good in spite of the fact that acquiring knowledge usually makes people better off, at least in the long run? How might a desire satisfactionist argue that knowledge is not a basic good in spite of the aforementioned fact? Providing arguments for the hedonism and desire satisfactionist against knowledge being counted as a basic good can be accomplished by outlining their respective positions and then show that knowledge need not be a basic good in those systems.
Also, Mill believes that society’s moral standards would decline if lower quality pleasures were pursued. While I believe that both theories have their own pros and cons, I believe that Bentham’s idea of utilitarianism is more reasonable in modern society. Everyone in this world is different and some people have different interests and pastimes than others, and as I stated earlier, if one is content with their life and sees no reason to change it, who should tell him or her otherwise? Mill’s theory makes some sense when the fact that some pleasures are more intellectually stimulating than others is taken into consideration, but not everyone has those types of interests, and not allowing people to choose interests that suit them best would cause them suffering, leading to the decline of society as a whole. In conclusion, while Mill has a good point in stating that society’s standards would increase if certain pleasures and fields of study were
Tony is very |would be to assign Tony with task that he will be good at |that his knowledge and experience is increasing. | | |inexperienced due to a recent position change and |accomplishing and provide him with words of praise or words of |This will allow Tony to feel confident when | | |for that fact is very insecure in his ability to |affirmation that tells Tony how great of a job he is doing. |working along side his pears and allow him to not| | |perform. Tony often gets defensive and feels |Assigning Tony with task that requires thoroughness and |be on his guard when co-workers offer suggestions| |
Moreover, if we spend little time but the outcome is good, it will promote our habit of procrastinating. 3. Procrastination is not only pervasive, it's also pernicious. The result of putting things off is lost of sleep, time, and energy but achieve less. It does become a
A decision based on rationality is said to be logical, reasoned and sensible, whereas an emotional decision is passion-filled and unreliable. This is only true in some cases, but it is in my opinion that an intelligent person is both emotional and rational, using both of these features in different circumstances to make the best decisions. However, it depends on the situation you’re in whether it would be better to react from an emotional perspective or from a rational one. There are many circumstances under which an emotional person would be clouded from seeing the lack of logic in a situation that a rational person would be able to deal with. If someone is in an abusive relationship, they may not be able to end it because their emotions outweigh they ability to think rationally, whereas to everyone outside of the relationship the only logical thing to do is the end the relationship.
While difficult to achieve, individuals and institutions with higher integrity tend to outlast those with less. The advantages of integrity are almost never evident in the short run, - it is always tempting to sacrifice integrity to make a quick success. Integrity tends to beget