Offer and Invitation to Treat

573 Words3 Pages
In this question, there are many distinguishing between offer and invitation to treat. The first is from meanings. Offer is an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed, the offeree. Invitation to treat different with offer it means an invitation to make an offer. An invitation to treat is not an offer, but an indication of a person's willingness to negotiate a contract. At first, in Harvey v Facey (1893), in this case, it was held that there was no contract. A mere statement of price is not enough to constitute an offer. The statement of price was merely the provision of information. Whether an invitation to treat is an offer or invitation to treat depends on the intention of the party placing the advertisement. In most cases, advertisements are treated as an invitation to treat unless on exceptional fact situations as in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1892). In this case, there was an acceptance of offer by the plaintiff’s conduct. Have some Advertisements of unilateral contract are offers. A unilateral contract is the offer is made in a form whereby the person to whom the offer is addressed can accept by fulfilling some condition, but has no obligation until they do so. For example, in Partridge v Crittenden (1968) illustrates the general rule that advertisements are normally regarded as an invitation to treat. One of the most common examples of an invitation to treat occurs where goods are displayed in a shop window or on the shelves of a supermarket. The reason behind this rule is that to hold otherwise, the seller has to sell whatever quantity of item displayed and the buyer cannot change his mind once an item is chosen and taken from the display shelf. For instance, in Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash

More about Offer and Invitation to Treat

Open Document