‘Not What Man Sees, but What God Sees’. Define the Relationship Between the ‘Subjective’ and ‘Objective’ Poet as Articulated by Browning in His ‘Essay on Shelley’, and Consider How These Categories Might Relate to His

2656 Words11 Pages
Robert Browning is accredited with very little formal prose work, he did however produce the piece ‘Introductory Essay’ (or ‘Essay on Shelley’); a criticism of The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley. He used the essay itself to admire Shelley and fix Shelley’s place in the literary scheme, referring to it as ‘that mighty ladder’ and thus suggesting order, or rather evolution in poetry and in that Shelley was at the pinnacle of this. It would appear that Browning himself comes to no clear conclusion about whether Shelley is either subjective or objective within his own poetry, rather he discusses the relationship between the two and thus come to some sort of fusion between the two ideals. Browning also chooses to discuss the matter of a poet’s bibliography and how looking back upon such does not vindicate their work, rather just categorise them instead, ‘The man passes the work remains. The work speaks for itself, as we say: and the biography of the worker is no more necessary to an understanding or enjoyment of it, than is a model or anatomy of some tropical tree, to the right tasting of the fruit we are familiar with on the market stall..’ Browning’s use of simile at the end of this quote suggests poetry to be considered just as the poem, rather than as a piece of work by a particular author, much like the ‘fruit’ from said tree. With this, we thus understand his reference later to Plato and the ‘Platonic Idea’ of a created amount of things being produced as imperfect copies and from which they derive their own existence. Thereby suggesting that poetry itself does not (or rather cannot) reflect the author at all times, more so it simply reflects upon itself as its own piece of work. Percy Bysshe Shelley produced a piece of work entitled ‘A Defence of Poetry’ a piece which can be considered alongside many of the views Browning stumbles upon during this particular
Open Document