The reason is the perceived view that it is the lack of gun control that has resulted in the number of firearms-related deaths in the country. In fact, this is one of the most stated, but wrong, arguments for gun control. The fact of the matter is that if gun control is put into place there are more chances that law-abiding citizens will be victims. Gun control laws to a large extent can have no effect on criminals, as there will always be a thriving black market for trade of guns and firearms. (Nair,
When law enforcement is not present in a community it gives the people in the community the thought that law enforcement does not care what happens to the people in their community. The people in the community that obey the law and are not committing crimes start to develop a sense that their community is not safe because law enforcement is not enforcing the law. Then the people that are involved in criminal activity in the community are able to take over the community because law enforcement does not have a regular presence in the community. In most areas like this when people that live in the community have a problem and they call law enforcement it takes long periods of time for them to get there to solve the problem. A lot of times by the time law enforcement arrive in these areas the perpetrator has already gotten away or the civilian has already taken matters into their own
The federal government has deemed it necessary to investigate anyone that seems in any way suspicious in the way of terrorism. This extends from illegal search and seizure to allowing any future cell phone or computer usage to be watched without a new warrant. Civil liberties activists claim that this, again, is an infringement on Constitutional rights while others claim this is a necessary infringement to protect our communities and people. Another issue with the expansion of the executive branch is the cooperation on a local, state, and federal level. The argument is that police are too involved in the legal aspects of collecting evidence, while intelligence agents are too uninvolved.
The government hopes to also gain the two hotels involved in the crime, sell them, and gain money for taxpayers (Barr). Unfortunately business owners aren’t the only citizens that neglect to report illegal immigrants, such as those in favor of illegal immigration. Those who disregard the law only undermine the policies set forth by the American government and ultimately hinder the enforcement of said laws. Here lies the biggest problem of present-day immigration, the United States government simply does not have the capacity to fully implement and uphold the current policies and laws that it has put in place. From massive borders to disobedient citizens, the United States government is unable to enforce their own policies of immigration.
The issue on the sale of firearms is a highly disputed one. There are those that believe weapons should be completely banned, undoubtedly resulting in a decrease in crime and murder. However, to those who love to hunt and shoot skeet, this would be extremely unfair. Many people rely on guns as self-defense, never causing unjust harm. It is a debate that has no right answer, and two justifiable sides.
Analysis Republicans don’t agree with the assault weapon bans. They are suggesting other ways to prevent mass shooting. They believe assault weapons ban is going to encourage more crimes. Instead of banning assault weapons republics are suggesting to find out who has the access to those guns, especially people who are mentally ill. This is a serious concern because it would be impossible to track each and every person who is mentally
Martial arts are created for self defense so why don’t people spend more time learning them instead of wasting their money on a gun which can break or be used against their own will? Finally, I believe that gun ownership should be banned because of the fact that it really isn’t helping protecting yourself. Ever since guns have been introduced they have been used for violence purposes and all they do is just making us want to eliminate one another. Do you really need a bullet when you can acquire peace so much
Rather Jonathan Stray thinks it is possible to address gun use instead of availability. Some public health and firearms experts have argued that solving mental issues will not help stop gun violence because they think that focusing on mental illness may not achieve much results because the vast majority of shootings are committed by people who do not fit the profile of those deemed dangerous. Moreover, by shifting the debate away from gun
In addition, Shaffer effectively defends her idea that banning handguns will have no effect on reduction of violent crime, but may actually increase instances of gun crimes. This is due to the fact that civilians would no longer be able to defend themselves effectively. The second article, “Gun control standoff” both sides remain unsolved in bitter debate. Gun control continues to bring out the worst in public opinions. Jost states: “Gun control supporters blame the high rate of violent crime and the large number of gun accidents and suicides on the easy availability of firearms and
Gun control People are afraid of leaving their places after dark; unfortunaly, there are no supper heroes to save the world from evil like the movies. Then, it difficult to survive and protect the family because the goverment can't guarantee complete security for everbody. That is the reason people need weapons to feel safe. But it be asserted that the problem is solved? How do you feel if the society where people can buy weapons legally or the ones where you could not even own a weapon?