At the conclusion of her essay, Ozick personifies the essay as “she”, giving us a better idea of what an essay would look like or would do if it were a “she”. Ozick says “She may be bold, she may be diffident, she may rely on beauty or cleverness, on eros or exotica. Whatever her story, she is the protagonist, the secret self's personification”. She uses the title in her essay to say that the writing can be looked at as if it were an actual person. It embodies the writer, yes, but it also embodies a person.
How do the connections between the two texts enrich the meaning of each text? When considered on their own, texts are constructed to create meaning and impart that meaning on a responder. However when two linked texts a considered together, their meanings are enriched as the responder can compare both texts, and take extra meaning from how the two texts differ and agree with each other, by evaluating which is more effective. Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice when read in isolation can be a simple bildungsroman narrative about the maturation of a young woman. However if the responder were to read Fay Weldon’s Letters to Alice on first reading Jane Austen, the connections between the two would shape and then reshape the responder’s understanding of both texts.
Mandy Brown What are the four types of essay organization discussed in the course readings? What characteristics make these essays expository? In reading "How to Succeed as an Online Student" and "A Soul as Free as the Air: About Lucy Stone" I found that these essays are providing much defined evidence to back up what is being said. Such as in "How to Succeed as an Online Student" they have different topics which narrows down to what the essay will be about and also providing information on those topics which all sums up to the main point and again go back to the title of the essay "How to succeed as an Online Student". Also are supporting the position, and at the same time are making the points very easy to distinguish the difference in each.
Internalize is how other people judge the individual. If someone is told that they’re a horrible person that is a waste of space then their self-concept will hold that. Self-esteem is how individuals feel vulnerable, or how much we honor ourselves. Someone with high self-esteem will feel wanted and valued. Rogers though that everyone holds a different concept of self, called the ‘ideal self’ this is how we would like to see ourselves, what we admire to be.
What was right about Debbie’s initial approach to the test? Debbie completed the easy multiple choice and left the ones that she didn’t know. She used her remaining time to complete her essay. She had a good idea going in to use the information on the test to complete her essay. Her frustration got the best of her and clouded her focus.
Hello, Andrea. This is Marie E. and, I will be your e-structor who will help you in your paper. Shall we start now? *Strengths of the essay: I like that you included dialogues in your work. Here’s an example: “Caitlin called and said, “My Mom’s dead!” Dialogues are important because they help your readers visualize your experience.
This stage is important because it determines if he or she can figure out the main plot of the story. The next stage is recited. This is where he or she may decide to tell another student what he or she has learned. The final stage is review. Reviewing after you have read a chapter allows the content to stay fresh in his or her head.
Good day, Jacquella! My name is Ana F. and I’ll be your e-structor for this submission. Let me offer you some useful writing tips to help you improve your essay. Let’s begin! *Strengths of the essay: You did a good job in differentiating listening from hearing, Jacquella: “Listening and hearing are two different processes.” Through this, your readers can have a better insight about listening, leading them into a proper perspective about your
One of my writing strengths would be structure and information. I like to explain things to the fullest, so the reader understands the piece inside and out. I like to give a lot of reasons, and back up my opinions using facts and observations. As for one of my writing weaknesses, I’d say that it would be the fact that I may write too much. I have received criticism from different individuals saying that I over analyze the smallest of things.
Neat People vs Sloppy People In her essay, Britt makes a comparison and contrast between neat people and sloppy people. She compares these two kinds of people giving a tone of humor “neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people” (Britt, p. 242) and a little bit of sarcasm in her contrast, “while sloppy people are the result of their extreme moral rectitude.” (Britt, p. 242) By saying this, Britt introduces us to her essay where she follows to list the similarities and differences between neat people and sloppy people. She tells the readers how the sloppy people have these ideals that one day they are going to get organized, while neat people like to relax so they just get rid of clutter the fastest way possible so that they do not have to waste any time doing it later. Britt wrote this essay in which the reader can feel identified with the subject, because the reader will feel compelled to choose either the side of the neat people or the side of the sloppy people. She calls neat people insensitive in the first sentence of the last paragraph she says “Near people cut a clean swath through the organic as well as the inorganic world.