Some people may argue that killing during war is a sin because many people end up losing their lives, on the other hand others may say that killing during war should not count as a sin because the soldiers are risking their lives to protect their land and the innocent people who live there. Although most people say that it shouldn’t count as a sin because when soldiers fight during war, they are protecting their land and the innocent people that accommodate it. They also have orders from the military leader that they cannot disobey. It is also mentioned in the Bible and the Quran that people must protect their country and others who live there. Killing people during war time should not count as a sin for many reasons.
They believe this was a right that they were given by our Four Fathers, which is clearly not true. Yes, they have the freedom of speech but when should the freedom be taken away? What about the rights of the innocent victims and their families? Hate crimes, because of their nature will always lead to violence and this is not a freedom that people should have. In my opinion, the penalties for hate crimes should continue to be more severe than that of a regular crime because so many innocent people are injured and even killed simply because they are different.
They shall begin to be deployed almost immediately to a specific battle zone, along with both their resources and equipment. They shall be fighting for an aim or set of aims indicated by the government. The armed services exist as servants of the government and may only go into military action when ordered to do so by the government. They are unable to choose when or where they are too serve. The implications of this on the services are far reaching due to the fact there is the ever current risk to the lives of serving soldiers who are in combat or an area of global instability.
The 18th amendment contributed to the rise of organized crime because it created a lot of underground business. From killings to people living in poverty, that’s what the prohibition caused. If people really thought that prohibiting alcohol to be sold leally were going to help the way that people lived during this time, they were wrong. A lot of people were against the law, they argued that if they banned alcohol legal businesses were going to go broke and that was not going to help the economy get better. But alcohol was not the only thing breaking families apart they said, after the war, soldiers would come home and find themselves in a whole, struggling to find jobs.
Although the Army had been in these parts of Iraq before the Marines were, the grunts, ground soldiers, of the Marines knew that the Army didn’t do their job and that they would now have to clear the area of all Mujahideen themselves. The Mujahideen are a global terrorist organization that occupies many parts of the Middle East, and the main group of people America was fighting against along with the Al Qaeda. As these soldiers have as much fun as they can and develop a brotherhood with each other, they also experience many tragedies and losses as many of their fellow Marines lose their lives and limbs while defending
The orders the sergeants shouted at them were exactly that: orders. You had to obey them. This was designed so that in Vietnam, if they received an order, the soldiers were to carry it out without questioning the motive, or the reasoning behind it. This was a cause of the My Lai massacre, because when the situation in My Lai was confronted, soldiers with experience might have reacted differently. Soldiers that were experienced with war situations, might have stopped and thought “Wait, this is not right.” But as the soldiers of Charlie Company had no experience, they continued to massacre
It was what had brought them to the war in the first place, nothing positive, not dreams of glory or honor, just to avoid the blush of dishonor. The died so as not to die of embarrassment”(483). This quote describes what the men were feeling they wanted to go home and leave a lot of them were cowards deep down but they didn’t was to disappoint and be cowards because they came to the war and most were trying to do it the honorable way even if it led to death it was better than leaving like a
As it was them who started the protest which turned into a revolution and also they were the ones behind the mutiny of the troops. However, the military was having many problems such as the war was going horribly wrong with many casualties, poor commanding from officers and limited military resources and equipment. The peasants were doing the fighting and the dying. So this could be a small contributing factor to the fall of the Romanov's on several different reasons. Firstly the tsar did not help the peasants personally, but instead leave the burden to the prime ministers when they cannot rule like a democracy today.
“Taking the Blackhawk Out for Lunch” The moral dilemma in this case study is that the soldiers created the “appearance of impropriety.” The big issue is that to civilians and probably other service members, the situation looked like an abuse of time, equipment, power, and taxpayer’s contributions. When planning a mission, even a training mission, it is your responsibility and duty to follow your commander’s intent and be a trusted professional at all times. By using a precious resource designated for work, those soldiers damaged the trust of civilians and other soldiers that they placed in them to train diligently and be prepared for whatever their country calls on them for. This case study is a clear breakdown of virtues ethics and deontological. If the soldiers
His initiative was used against the problem of the members of the communist party lacking high level military experience. He solved this problem by recruiting former soldiers of the Tsarist army and to ensure their loyalty he held their families hostage. Although this may have caused problems in that it was not an ethically correct thing to do it meant that he was reinforcing the communist army and therefore this move gave Trotsky