Nature vs Nuture

519 Words3 Pages
Nature | Nurture | What is it?: | In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism or innatism). | In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism). | Example: | Nature is your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised. | Nurture refers to your childhood, or how you were brought up. Someone could be born with genes to give them a normal height, but bemalnourished in childhood, resulting in stunted growth and a failure to develop as expected. | Factors: | Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by biological and family factors. | Nurture factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by social and environtment factors | Nature vs nurture in the IQ debate Evidence suggests that family environmental factors may have an effect upon childhood IQ, accounting for up to a quarter of the variance. On the other hand, by late adolescence this correlation disappears, such that adoptive siblings are no more similar in IQ than strangers. Moreover, adoption studies indicate that, by adulthood, adoptive siblings are no more similar in IQ than strangers (IQ correlation near zero), while full siblings show an IQ correlation of 0.6. Twin studies reinforce this pattern: monozygotic (identical) twins raised separately are highly similar in IQ (0.86), more so than dizygotic (fraternal) twins raised together (0.6) and much more than adoptive siblings (almost 0.0). Consequently, in the context of the "nature versus nurture" debate, the "nature" component appears to be much more important than the "nurture" component in explaining IQ variance in the general adult population of theUnited States. EDITNature vs nurture in personality traits

More about Nature vs Nuture

Open Document