Nature vs. Nurture: Psychological and Sociological Debate

472 Words2 Pages
Crystal McArdle Heather Hill Oral/ Interpersonal Communication June 14, 2013 Nature vs. Nurture: Psychological and Sociological Debate After reading quite a few different articles on the topic of Nature vs. Nurture, it is apparent that the controversy and debate is still very alive today. This website’s article illustrates educated views between environmentalists and behaviorists. I encourage those who are intrigued by this topic to also read the noted theories by various psychologists throughout the article. I found myself in a personal debate and reflected on where I stand on this matter. The article indicates the inconsistency with an “all or nothing” view and instead reminds us to interpret it on a more “how much?” basis. I strongly believe that both nature and nurture play an important role in our upbringing and well into our adult lives. There are arguments throughout this article and many others that state intellectual ability is solely an inherited trait. While I beg to differ the concept of Galton when he suggested that human society would be improved by “better breeding,” I can understand the viewpoint. I can more easily relate to the reasoning that the differences in intellectual ability are a product of social inequalities. I believe that in some less-fortunate communities or families, access to better materials and opportunities is limited, resulting in behavioral differences than those with full access to those resources. I am a product of a well-rounded upbringing. Through constructive guidance and nurturing, my parents taught me the important principles and morals that I continue to live by today. My family isn’t billionaires, but we know that you have to work hard for the things that you want. They taught me that my independent personality is an incredible trait to have, but always reminded me it’s ok to ask for help when needed. Perhaps
Open Document