. . This court, however, has rejected mere "speculative reasoning" as a basis for proving access, especially when intermediaries are involved. Id. Reasoning that amounts to nothing more than a "tortuous chain of hypothetical transmittals" is insufficient to infer access.
“Essay 2” “Red Serpent Ceviche” is written by Antonio Farias, In this story the author portrays a flashback combined with current time theme. In which Simon (The main character) locates his father in the 7 train, Simon seems to go into some sort of deep thinking phase. Which seemed confusing? In which he starts talking about diversity and saying that it isn’t exactly how it’s cracked up to be (Farias 72). Meaning that people have a false perception of it, and also claiming that the nostalgia that haunts him belongs to his father (Farias 72).
In the beginning the author used colons and semicolons to build up the next statement and to also show the contrast in his complex sentence structure. His sentences are just like the trip that his son is about to embark on. The road that his son is traveling on may start out bumpy and divided. In the middle the author switched to an extended epistrophe that dealt mainly with words referring to himself such as I, me, mine, and my. Now, he is depicting the middle of his son’s road trip.
Beebe, Beebe, & Ivy (2012) noted that “words and actions are tools we use to let someone know whether we support them or not”(p.76) Jack Gibbs has researched supportive and defensive communication for a couple years now and he defines defensive communication as “a language that creates a climate of hostility and mistrust”(p. 76-77) In the scene the father uses crude language and even goes to the extent of saying that “the kid would be better off living in a dumpster than with Sonny” (Adam Sandler). The relationship between the father and Adam Sandler was not on good terms in the first place and by this form of communication the relationship is now beyond repair. The meaning of words used in this scene had a strong influence on both of the actor’s reactions and therefore the conversation grew to a hostile argument. The next topic will be focused on discussing non-verbal
He also confided about his relationship with his father, “I mean, I can’t even make any sense out of my relationship with my father . . . How am I supposed to make any sense out of Auschwitz? .
Origin A. Chasity will explain the Origin of the name 1. Where he was born and when 2. Secondly, where he lived, ruled and how he handled intrapersonal relationships. B. In addition to, Ashdon will clarify the odd relationship with his father which led to late brutal exploits 1.
He talks about when his brother was first born in the beginning of the story and how he was happy that he was getting someone to hang out with. Once he found out that his brother was undeveloped he says a lot of things that I think a healthy person should say, such as planning on smothering his brother with a pillow. I consider that the narrator did not sound like an average child, his personality might have been that way since the birth of his brother, but we do not get to read a lot about his life and feelings before his brother was born. I think the relationship between the narrator and his brother is very complex, and cannot be described easily. It was confusing to tell what he narrators true feelings were throughout the story, but I believed that he loved his brother.
In particular, when speaking of Spies, the lines are not as clear as they do not accept the tenets of Christianity but see activities such as prayer or forgiveness as useful to the secular world. Because of this area of debate, the idea of absolutes is not possible. Without absolutes, how can we actually give someone guidance on how and where to go in their lives? Without a spiritual path that is laid out and definite, where does someone with a troubled soul go? I am grateful for the door that the book opens by illustrating how the two worlds of psychology and Christianity can be married yet as in any marriage, there is always areas that are not
Also do not forget the fact that Saudi Arabia is a religious country . Many people in Saudi Arabia agree that women shouldn’t drive a car because it is so suspicious . They believe this , because in my thinking , Saudi Arabia didn’t developed early like the other countries . If we look to the fact that Saudi Arabia is a Muslim country or an Arabic country as reason to prevent women from driving that’s certainly wrong , because all the other Muslims countries in the Arabic world allow women to drive . But some people with the entrenched mindsets make religion an excuse to prevent driving .It does not say any thing in Qur’an about that .
Can science and religion be reconciled: Can science and religion be reconciled? Is there a middle ground between belief and factual scientific evidence? Some believe there is, but many believe there isn't. There are so many arguments between the two groups that it feels, sometimes, as if they are at war with each other. One does not understand the other, and vice versa.