Colonel Jessep is then convicted of the murder of Santiago, although he never understands his responsibility for the crime committed. Similar to the movie, Milgram’s The Perils of Obedience discusses the same issues of obedience to authority and how far people will go in pleasing their authority figure even if it means ignoring their own beliefs and morals. Milgram observes through a personal experiment that people will go to extreme measures to please
Using my detective reasoning and the evidence found at the scene of the crime, I have deducted that the suspects Louise Hume and Gary Adams are indeed the culprits of this murder. My educated guess is that Louise Hume is the murderer and that Gary Adams served as an accomplice. The couple claim that Gary and Clark were hanging out at 10pm drinking and that Louise Hume arrived at 12.30am to find Gary and Clark arguing, Clark then supposedly pulls a knife on Louise but Gary tries to stop him and in the scuffle stabs Clark in self-defense, Gary then tried to drag Clark towards the road to help flag down a motorist to help. Many elements of their story don’t add up, they said that Clark and Gary were drinking at 10pm and that when Louise arrived they were already arguing, even though there was 3 chairs found at the scene, a discarded lipstick container and an empty tequila bottle with lipstick and DNA belonging to Louise Hume on it, the guys would have already finished drinking the bottle before 12.30am and they also said that Gary and Clark were already arguing by the time that Louise arrived and that was when he drew a
This explains why Jonathan was the one to report the murder, in order to appear innocent of the crime, however it seems as though the business associates and Rita doubled crossed Jonathan by placing a knife with the initials JLS. This was probably meant as fail-safe in case the police discover their plot; Jonathan would be the one to be charged with
Caroline Rose Dr. Sean Morris November 1, 2012 ENGL 2900 Scene Analysis Word Count: 1322 Shot Sequence Minute: 95:35 – 96:44 Murder from a Mobster’s Angle The following scene from Miller’s Crossing (Joel Cohen, 1990) gives the viewer a sense of just how violent life as a mobster can be. To mobsters, murder is business-like and does not hold the same consequences as it does in the outside world. Dressed in a silk robe, mobster boss Johnny Casper (Jon Polito) has no problem murdering a man on the floor of his study. Shot 1 begins with the sudden sound of a bang and a slightly off-center widescreen shot of Johnny Casper, just after hitting Eddie Dane (J.E. Freeman) in the face with a fireplace shovel.
Now it’s ironic how they were great friends and companions towards each other, however Macbeth is the one who ultimately kills Banquo without even laying a finger on him. Macbeth’s guilt from Duncan’s murder carried on in Macbeth’s life, as he was too scared to fight off this darkness. Now Macbeth was faced with a decision whether or not to murder Banquo to keep his royal prophecies true. With the help of his gang, the decision was clear enough for him not to pass. Instead of Macbeth directly killing Banquo, Macbeth hired his gang members to act out this murder.
11/03/2014 Gary Ridgway Gary Ridgway was best known as the “Green River” serial killer due to where he left his victims. For two decades Ridgway went on a shocking killing spree targeting more than forty-eight prostitutes and teenage runaways. Overtime, killing became part of his well-being. It takes a certain kind of mind to digest the taking of another human life with no remorse. For an individual to lose self-control in such deviant and heinous activity, left fear upon many.
Sutherland’s differential association theory imputes the cause of crime to intimate social contacts and learnt behaviour (Bernard, et al., 2010 p.180). Sutherland made criminologists aware of “white collar criminals” by introducing the term and by making society aware of middle and high class criminals and crimes (Sutherland, 1983). When Sutherland originally attempted to publish his book on white collar crime the Indiana University and Dryden (who the f is Dryden?) demanded the removal of names from his book, due to possible backlash it would cause and alienation of the wealthy businesses who contributed to the university (Sutherland, 1983). His book was eventually published in 1949 without the names of companies he accused of committing criminal behaviour (Sutherland, 1983).
The Roulet wheel of course denied all charges. But later, Mikey realized that the defendant could cheats him (as, for example, about studying at university). When he knew that Reggie Campo was a prostitute, because he left Roulet napkin with the address and price, Holler decided that it case closed in favor of his client. However, all assumptions have been destroyed, when the prosecutor, who named Minton said that the prosecution will not change course, and the trial will take place. The reason for that was the name of a knife Roulet, found in the blood at the crime scene.
Also, Perry and Dick weren’t judged like mentally ill person even thought their lawyer called twice some psychiatrists to make some reports. Even though I do not think that death sentence is worth the crime they did, I do not think an instant death actually worth’s all the suffering they made, a life sentence was not long enough to keep them from killing again. For example, when Dick was free from prison the first time, he killed the Clutters. For the reasons cited above, I think that justice was
Psychological theory doesn’t explain the social reasons why the serial killer becomes who he is, such as poverty and the people around him creating the behavior of killing tendencies. Biological theory also is not related in his article. Where as these serial killers motives were passed down from relatives that had the same unstable sense of subconscious mind. That their behavior is passed down threw generations and the environment around them shapes their motives. What was missing in the article was the biosocial attributes that can shape a killer.