Most People Are Weird

497 Words2 Pages
Abstract In the article, Most People Are Not Weird, the authors discuss how the vast majority of experimental findings use participants who are from Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic societies, which only makes up 12% of the world’s population. . Thus, generating theories that do not apply to diverse populations. Also, this prevents individuals to fully grasp human psychology and behaviour. Furthermore, to improve and create a broad representation it is suggested that editors should support various evidence, acknowledge researchers for comparing various groups, promote cross-disciplinary, cross cultural research and assess how the results apply to other population. Commentary Given the valid arguments that Joseph Henrich, Steven Heine & Ara Norenzayan (2010) provided in the article, Most People Are Not Weird, influenced my opinion to agree with their observation. Research that only participates in collecting and studying a small portion of the population, such as the 12% of WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) participants does not provide a broad representation. Thus, creating a challenge for individuals to being able to fully comprehend human psychology and behaviour. According to Henrich et al. (2010) they argued that having a limited and narrow selection of participants becomes problematic due to the results precisely being bias to a certain group, which does not reflect the full extensiveness of human diversity. Sampling from a slim population creates complications because researchers often assume that the outcomes are universal, which leads researchers to construct and publish concepts that do not apply to all population. Thus, benefiting only the slim slice of population allows them to develop quicker because the researchers assessment provides support and incorporates factors that aids only towards the WEIRD
Open Document