For the cinema market building something which can seat enough people with the right equipment (e.g. huge high definition screen with state of the art projectors) can be hard to create, due to high set up costs. Furthermore there is more to do, for example gain the rights to shoe new films, which can be very expensive unless you benefit from economies of scale. A natural barrier to entry is the exploitation of economies of scale, where the big firms in the business, in this case Vue, Cineworld and Odeon are using their economies of scale to deter any new entrant away. The top three firms have a relationship and power to obtain the viewing rights to screen 2”first-run” films and to do so at a lower price.
Situation Analysis Five Force: The force of Supplier is powerful, they sell raw materials at a high price to capture some of the industry's profits. The force of customer is powerful, too. Our auto-producing customers have the erratic production schedules. The competitive also struggling with earn decrease and production decrease. The threat of the substitution and new entry are weak.
As Sainsbury's have a hierarchical structure they are most likely to lose a lot of money because for the marketing and research and development departments to carry out their functions they would need funding from the finance department. For this information to get to the finance department a lot of time would have been wasted and also for the finance department to reply to them, all this would cost them a lot of money. Advantages of Sainsbury's is that the power they have would be successful for the business as when work is being done the communication of the workers together when given commands from the manager and having to work better for the manager to impress them in order for more work to be done and at a more well-organized rate then if there was no pressure from the manager. Disadvantages would be that the workers would start to get stressed from having to complete the workload at too fast a pace for them to work at all times that they will start to work less and dislike there job and some days may not want to work as they are stressed to do work which is too much for them to cope as they are trying too hard to impress, this could lead to employees wanting to quit their job. Advantages are that when having to complete work set out by the manager to the employees it can be done efficiently so that the manager will be able to assess the employee and they could get a promotion to a higher part of their job.
Assuring competition is critical to maintaining low prices, high quality, and business efficiency. Blair and Lopatke (2008 explained that by eliminating the competition, dominant sellers can increase monopoly profits and deadweight of social welfare losses can occur (p. 442, 439). But not all monopoly companies causes harm, some companies like the water utility, natural monopoly, and is regulated by the government (McConnell, 2012, pp.
Fewer companies are willing to enter the market because of the SOX requirements that make going public too costly. Plus, the maintenance required to stay public is too expensive for smaller companies, forcing companies to look elsewhere to raise capital. Rising costs persuade large numbers of companies to exit the public markets to sidestep SEC regulation, creates two problems. First, the overall economy could suffer because corporations limit investment projects due to the higher-cost sources of capital to fund potentially new operations. Second, financially stressed companies that go dark are the very companies’ shareholders need to monitor usually and where transparency is most important.
They lower their prices and make their products alternative to competitors that are more expensive. Both companies defraud their consumers by pretending to deliver high culture to the masses (Cave & Klein, 2000). Consumers normally do not recognize the false advertisement because IKEA and Old Navy put their items in popular shows and commercial, so that customers will buy
Therefore, company A needs to stop making this product. Although we can argue that if company A could reduce the cost dramatically, it can become profitable. However, as the demand of its headphones is shrinking and there are so many suppliers (due to low barrier of entry), there will be great price pressure on the product, as explained by William F. Samuelson and Stephen G. Marks (2010). The price reduction may over shallow the possible cost reduction the firm could achieve. Susan Schreter’s second step is to target new customers from within groups.
Those who consider it to be a negative term, mainly the average consumer, would define price gouging as taking advantage of or exploiting in times of need by charging unfair and unreasonable prices beyond normal. On the other hand, a business owner or an entrepreneur would define it as turning a profit on goods which have suddenly become much more expensive to obtain or produce because of increased demand possibly due to an emergency or sudden event. However, some free market economists reject the term altogether and suggest that “higher prices can be viewed as a valid system for rapidly distributing scarce resources to those who need the highly desirable resources and sets off an economic chain reaction that ultimately remedies the shortages” (Price gouging, 09). Over thirty of the states in America have anti-gouging laws but the definition of price gouging vary from “excessive and unjustified” price increases or “unconscionable pricing”, to percentages amounts of previous prices, to “unjust or unreasonable profits in the sale of necessities” (Antitrust - Fuel and Energy Committee, 06). So price gauging may not be easily defined but it does mean something to those it affects.
Antitrust Claims against Microsoft Monopolies, Trusts and Government Regulations Monopoly occurs when a large corporation or business fixes price to eliminate competition because they are the only major provider of a particular product. Monopoly affects economic growth negatively because since the price cannot be determined by the market, business is restricted. Trusts in business enable confidence to be built so that business can be conducted in fairness. Antitrust policies are regulations by government to ensure that businesses can operate on a certain degree of trust thereby ensuring that the market is not monopolized. Since monopoly caused unreasonable price hike, government must be able to exercise control or consumers and the economy will both be affected.
In short run profit maximization will increase however in long run it is harder to increase companies profit because they will need perfect information in order to prevent the risk of the market. According to reality in most of times big companies work for society, to get a brand image and name lowering prices, use child labor and pesticides in order to create lower cost and therefore increase their profit. Sometimes companies make polices in order to get subsides as low carbon emission. As a result more consumers are demanding these products. In the short run firms may not increase their profits because the cuts in prices but if they achieve this in long run they may experience maxim profits.