Mlk and Malcolm X Rhetorical Analysis

987 Words4 Pages
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two principal leaders of the African-American people, fighting for their people’s freedom and justice. Although the priorities of these two historical icons are one, their approaches toward it are distinct, as shown in their literary works. Upon Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and “I Have a Dream” speech, his major argument is that all men should be treated equally, for all men are created equally, and that this, which is his “dream,” shall be done in a peaceful manner. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Dr. King asks, “Isn't this like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act of robbery?” in response to segregationists’ claims that a black man fighting for his rights causes violence. In asking this rhetorical question, Dr. King refutes one’s such claim, and shows that violence is not a result of a black man’s struggle for his rights, but rather the result is one that usually comes within a person’s life: freedom. When stating the simile, “Like Paul, I must constantly respond to the Macedonian call for aid,” Dr. King compares his character and determination with an old prophet, saying that he will do everything his associated organizations ask of him, in order to achieve the objective of equal rights. “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today!” From Dr. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, his use of antithesis persuades and pressures the reader into his point of view, by showing his desire of his children being a positive one, against an unjust action occurring presently. Also, repetition is constantly used, such as the phrase, “I have a dream,” which is one of the
Open Document