This will not promote an anti discriminatory practice because the service provider is failing to treat the person because of their sexual orientation. People with disability might been seen as ‘ different’ and service providers can label them as being useless, stupid etc and this will affect the way they care for
So the experimenter could be lead to the thought that he/she had the power to harm another person but wouldn’t. A reason for an ethics board to approve a study like this one could be based on the fact that even though it may be unethical, the results produced outweigh the wrongness of it all. It is worth it to have the information
Having the same brand name as another product is also one of the things that are against the FDA’s regulations because this could protect the consumer from buying the wrong drug because of the similar names. If the wrong product was bought, it could have caused serious harm to the consumer, depending on the differences of the two
However, token economy has issues, such as that you could argue that you are taking away patient’s basic rights to use as rewards. Another criticism which shows why token economy may not be and appropriate and effective therapy is that it has low ecological validity; it may not transfer into the real world. Once patients are away from institutions, they often discarded desirable behavior as there are no longer any rewards to reinforce it. Another disadvantage is the ethical issues surrounding the use of behavioral therapy. It could be argued it doesn't really help the patient; it just makes their behavior more acceptable to others.
However without being covert with the gang may not have accepted him into their group and if they did accept him their behavior could be somewhat different to usual. Patrick (and many other covert participating studies) could’ve developed more problems, for example, some activities may involve the researcher acting out forms of behaviour that they may find is unethical and illegal which then leads more problems as the researcher has to employ a level of deceit, and lie about the nature of their presence in the group. For example, when sociologists research an extreme topic, such as prostitution, it is essential to do the research in covert participant observation otherwise it may endanger the researcher’s welfare. Sanders conducted a study on the female sex industry; she cooperated in
After researching and reviewing the Guidelines for Ethical Conduct for the Physician Assistant Profession, I conclude that Joe’s behavior is deemed unethical. He is violating many of the physician assistant codes, and could be reprimanded in the future. According to the Ethical Conduct for the Physician Assistant Profession, working with a friend or family member can form a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest in
People will think it is temporary but ignoring it will have already hurt the environment. Additionally, not only do people not notice such doublespeak, but even in the event that they identify doublespeak, they may not be against it because they do not understand its bad effects. Furthermore, he uses active words to express how doublespeak will hide reality from people. For instance, in the last two paragraphs, he states that doublespeak will produce “suspicions, cynicism, distrust and hostility”. He tries to get people’s attention to think about how doublespeak will disturb their lives.
Lack of personal hygiene can also have an effect on a person’s well-being by affecting their mental health which can lead to insecurities by them not feeling good about themselves and a loss of confidence. This can lead to their physical well-being if their health deteriorates. [LD 206.2] Know how to encourage an individual to maintain personal hygiene To encourage someone to maintain personal hygiene I should have a discussion with them to see if there is an underlying issue preventing them from carrying out this procedure, i.e. embarrassment, financial, cultural needs, we could look at what they would like to happen and the products they would like to use during their support and this could be put in their care plan. We should discuss the implications of them not carrying out personal care like infections and the effects e.g.
In Milgram's experiment, test subjects were asked to do something that was, on the surface, unethical. Milgram was fascinated by the way people could be persuaded to cause harm to individuals if the instructions came from authoritative figures or those who would be considered credible. Although Milgram's experiment would not be conducted today for ethical reasons, the information derived from Milgram's experiment
Behaviour such as removing personal clothing in a public place isn’t something most people would normally do. This is seen as “non typical” behaviour, and would not normally be associated with an individual who would describe themselves as functioning on an acceptable social and mental level. “However this explanation depends on the desirability of a particular behaviour or psychological ability. It is statistically rare to be classified as a genius, but this could be seen as a desirable quality and does not indicate clinical abnormality (Cardwell et al 2006). Therefore although some infrequent behaviour may be classed as abnormal, in view of this, that then proves that not all infrequent behaviour can be classed as abnormal.