Mengzi and Crawford Comparison

669 Words3 Pages
Wisdom that is Cultivated Through Works There are three different definitions of wisdom defined in Crawford’s writing, “Shop Class as Soulcraft.” The first is the wisdom of old, which Homer idealizes. This wisdom centers on the possession of technical skills, and the knowledge one gains from these skills. Yet, as one performs these skills he or she remains under the submission of the transcendent ideals of nature that embody a reality beyond oneself. As the western world has developed, the two remaining types of wisdom are introduced: religious “wisdom” and scientific “wisdom”. Religious wisdom cannot be tested empirically, but is, rather, based upon mystic philosophies. Scientific wisdom is likewise connected to the elements of nature, but modern scientists attempt to reduce these elements into a set of mathematical postulates through mental reasoning. When comparing Mengzi’s Confucian works and Crawford’s work on manual labor, these three types of wisdom were used as a basis for evaluation. The engagement in ritual and the act of workmanship both cultivate similar, if not the same type of wisdom. Throughout Mengzi’s reasoning, he consistently refers to wisdom. Wisdom, to Mengzi, is the virtue that consists of understanding all the other virtues, especially benevolence and righteousness. It is the ability to properly evaluate the character of others. It is the skillfulness needed to find the best means at achieving a goal. It is the understanding of what is ignoble and the avoidance of such things. It is the prudence of showing care and thought for the future. According to Mengzi, this wisdom is cultivated primarily through ritual. Ritual is the utilization of one’s one body to perform a certain act or ceremony. Certain rituals produce certain virtues. Thus, essentially, one’s thinking and one’s doing should begin to connect. With this seamless bond in place, one

More about Mengzi and Crawford Comparison

Open Document