Mass Civilization and Minority Culture

527 Words3 Pages
In the essay Mass Civilisation and Minority Culture (1930), F.R. Leavis expressed concern at the "desperate plight of culture to-day"; a culture dominated by mass-production, the popular press, media and film. Leavis’s contempt for mass civilization was based on his understanding that any belief in the "continuities" of society, more precisely defined as "the delicate traditional adjustments, the mature, inherited codes of habit and valuation" had been sacrificed in pursuit of "the cheapest emotional appeals, appeals the more insidious because they are associated with a compellingly vivid illusion of actual life". Such illusions of actual life were created by the mass media that commoditized culture. In good old days, producers had a directness of relationship with the consumers as they had to produce for individual clients. Such a discourse was responsible for providing a variety of styles and designs of products. The aesthetics of such designs/patterns of products were largely influenced by the taste of a minority of population having cultural authority (which is now termed as high-brows according to Leavis) that ruled the world. It is this ‘minority’ that according to leavis is ‘being cut off as never before from the powers that rule the world’, i.e. in defining/judging/informing the contours of culture. On the contrary the mass media has taken over and replaced this minority culture. The result is the ways in which the mass civilization in pursuit of standardizing art/literature/cultural norms and mass media in commoditizing culture has given way to pseudo critics who sell culture the way products are sold in a market. The end result is the birth of cheap emotions and sensitivities.

It can be argued that mass media does not enlighten people about which literature is authentic and which is not producing minds that could discriminate between both types of
Open Document