I believe many of you would argue that the law enforcement didn’t need to get a search warrant in order to search DLK’s house, because DLK could easily destroy the evidence. However, you must see that it is very hard to completely obfuscate evidence inside a home, as a house cannot be “moved” unlike any automobile. According to Chief Justice William Howard Taft, “...and a search of a ship, motor boat, wagon or automobile, … where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved…”. I bet all of us understand that although DLK could have tried to “cover up” the evidence, it would be certainly very hard to hide it completely (traces would
Starr makes it obvious that is just a pit stop because he mentions that the mouse “could not poke through the slit between the bottom of the glass door and the sill” (34). I think that is obvious because if that was his origin, he would have perfected a way to make it to the building and not tried to squeeze his way through the front door. Finally the rodent makes his way to his origin, a building that sits adjacent to the candy store. Maybe he has perfected a way to get to get in and out of this building; maybe he is trying his luck going through the front door, but either way, he is about to meet fate for taking a chance at a shortcut. The superintendent “was standing at the door” when the rodent made his way into the building.
The local government will influence the opening of the store as if the government does not agree with letting the shop open, it will not succeed. Also if the business is causing litter problems and there have been complaints off it from customers then they could tell them about it however they would not have the power to shut the business down or affect profit maximisation therefore it won’t influence the business a great amount. The national government will only influence the business by setting standard, in which the company must for-fill, such as, hygiene, health and safety, quality of food, etc.. and if the business does not reach these standards the store could be closed. In some ways this could affect the profit maximisation of the business as training would need to be required to the staff for health and safety, although this would not affect it too much. If the company wanted to keep the customers satisfied they would exceed these standards anyway therefore the government is not a great
People would avoid sin to be sure not to be punished by unemployment and bad economic standings, but without this fear, it was unknown what citizens of the United States would start acting like. Although I am reflecting directly on Coney Island, it was not the only place that this criticism was being found. People had a problem with the change in entertainment as a whole from theaters to movies houses and dance
Though the women were unaware of what Sammy had done. His actions were noble and this was also a focal point in the development of the character's growth. Sammy desire to quit his job runs more deeper than that of being the “unsuspected hero” of those women. Yes he did admire the beauty of Queenie, but at the same time its possible to assume that he wanted her lifestyle: All of a sudden I slid right down her voice into her living room. Her father and the other men were standing around in ice-cream coats and bow ties and the women were in sandals picking up herring snacks on toothpicks off a big plate and they were all holding drinks the color of water with olives and sprigs of mint in them.
In "The Lottery," Tessie is so entrenched, that she sees no way out. In "The Wave," Lori bugs into indoctrinization but she can think for herself and stand up for what she believes in and change what is happening. This says that society is so selfish they are to blind to see what is going on in front of them. And people who do see what is going on should act out, take a stand and start changing things. And if you don't the consequences could end up being really bad, it could lead to losing your friendship with someone because of a disagreement or it can even lead to
Part 1: In my words, I think that it means that no matter how well you plan something, you should always expect the unexpected. Maybe if you think you’ve done all you can for something to go right, but it ends up messing up as planned. The reason the speaker is comparing mice to men is because in the story, if you really look into it, the author is comparing the human world with the animal world about George and Lennie. Mice and men are similar through out this story because if you actually sit and think about it, you’ll realize that mice are just the same, because they are living beings on this earth as well. In the end of the book they all end up the same, because George wants to own his own farm, Lennie wants to have his own rabbits,
She took off her glasses and stared at me. "I'll tell you why," she said. "Because – he – is – trash, that's why you can't play with him. I'll not have you around him, picking up his habits and learning Lord-knows-what." (23.86-87) Aunty sees the Finch name like an exclusive brand – it’s valuable when you can only find it at Bloomingdale’s, but make it available at Wal-Mart and it’ll seem cheap.
I did not mean to eat the men that were assaulting me. However, I was just trying to defend myself so that I may no longer see or feel the sharp objects. I did not know any other way to react to this, for this hostility was new to me. After a while, no one else came so I decided to head home and inform my mother of what had happened. As I recalled my journey to Herot, my mother told me that the reason these humans showed hostility towards me is because humans and monsters were not meant to be friends.
“Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck, Lennie wants a home with rabbits, George tries and tries to achieve that goal. George is flexible with Lennie. Lennie messes everything up for them time and time again. George is still able to make a gain in profit and getting closer to his goal. Without Georges flexibility with Lennie they would have quit in life long before.