Once again…use examples to justify throughout the paragraph. Mood: What is mood? Why is it such an important element of drama? What mood/s were created throughout the play? Consider the audience and style of the play in this paragraph.
* Alan needs to improve on being mindful on a person to person basis. He needs to treat each employee as an individual. In our text it states “to being mindful we need to put aside any preoccupations, preconceptions and attend fully to what is happening in the moment” (Wood, J., 2012 pg161). * Alan tried different approaches when evaluating Gretchen and the male employee but still was ambushing both employees; Alan was listening, but was taking the information and using it against them. He needs to take each situation and act differently upon it.
He speaks carefully, weightily, and has a disconcerting habbit of looking hard at the person he adresses before actually speaking" This continues the idea of how the Inspector has a large affect on people and shows how he is going to interogate each family member later on in the play. This is an effective description as it conveys how Inspector Goole can be rather intimidating in the way he looks and addresses the characters in the
2. Stay on topic and rarely make it personal unless that avenue is challenged. 3. Use proper words with clarity that are deemed acceptable in the interviewing process. Three nonverbal expectations would in my opinion be 1.
He believed that actors could learn to present their character without trying to ‘become’ their character, unlike Stanislavski, who believed that actors should be able to bring out their character on stage through emotional memory (tapping into past emotions felt). Not only did he want physically capable actors (as the physical demands of acting are significantly high – acting is a sport) but also well-rounded thinkers who were capable of using their bodies to communicate ideas and emotions. Meyerhold also experimented with
The man could go to the court system and fight for his position on his behalf of discriminating against him for the way he looks. Probably not wanting the job after knowing the reason for not hiring him, but to prove my point would be more of what I would fight for. This man could also take some consequence with not saving his facial hair. Him and his family could have been depending on this job, the man might also think to himself that with this facial hair he would never get a teaching job, and maybe he should just stick it out and get rid of his facial hair despite on how his feels about his it. To me this is not right; someone having to sacrifice something they do not want to please someone
As an actor, he feels that his audience should see things for how they really are, versus how the directors, screenwriters want the audience to portray them. Michael continually stands up for what he believes. However, this is how he got his bad reputation thus no one wanting to hire him. The interpretation from the movie was that Michael was brought up in a culture of valuing the rights, needs and goals of individuals. This is what moved Michael into being controlling and only see rolls from his
How could the personal and social tensions between characters in the plays you have studied be expressed on stage. In your answer refer to the performance styles, techniques and conventions that you could use in staging two texts set for study. The Australian plays ruby moon and a beautiful life explore the personal and social tensions between characters. Both plays present a couple in a moment of crisis, and explore the way social tensions have become personal tensions. Australian audiences are able to understand and appriciate these social tensions which the plays present, and equally, to empathise with the personal tensions presented.
She responded mostly by interrupting his questions to let him know that she has the right to be “pissed off” at the world’s current situation due to these idiots and morons. This is where her passion about the argument really shows. She was legitimately infuriated at these people just by talking about them and their beliefs and actions. The whole lecture, movie and all, was very interesting and eye opening. I learned a lot about the truth about fracking and also about the sort of battle between people like Ann McElhinney and environmentalists, which is currently raging on.
Body language, eye contact and facial expressions all play a huge part in becoming the character the audience see’s onstage. This can be related to Stanislavsky’s ‘subtext’ theory, how we as actor’s must understand a characters motivation behind there actions. This will affect how the character acts non verbally. In relation to my explorations, use of non verbal communication was key in the scene where Abigail attempts to seduce John and justify an affair (act 1). Me and my partner first decided the subtext for both characters.