The trial court found that it was not, and granted the defendant summary judgment. In this case, John Marhshall was not the proximate cause of the death because Mr. Smith was experiencing psychosis symptoms prior to his death. The other sypmtoms he experienced were only reported to his roomate and not the nurse, therefore the nurse had no idea he was experiencing such issues. Hence, the nurse or the hospital was not the proximate cause of his suicide and may have resulted from several other factors. IV.
They did not follow the proper procedures for the offense when terminating some employees. Management also disregarded the Merit Rule for dismissal supported by just cause. Before DelDOT management took the actions that they did with all employees involved, they should have consulted with their human resources department. Human resources should have told the managers the proper way to proceed with the disciplinary actions to all involved. They could have explained to the managers that immediate termination is not the proper form of discipline for the offenses mentioned.
Unanimously it was held that even if H L had been found to have been detained it would have been justified under common law of necessity. Although concurring this finding it was commented that was an “unfortunate result as it left compliant but incapacitated patients without safe guards” of patients that had formally been detained under the mental health
The sheer numbers involved results is a random combination of health implications. Most people will not notice anything, or pass any slight symptom off as getting older. Other people who have more of a reaction will go to the doctor and get diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia is a catch all disease that was created about a decade ago to give doctors something to tell the patient when they complained. The doctors can't accurate diagnose or understand what or why a patient is feeling a certain way, so the corrupt medical establishment gives them this nonsense to spew.
While the physician did not believe that, at the time of treatment, the patient was competent to make this decision, the patient had an advanced directive that clearly stated that he did not wish to be intubated. Provision 2.1 of the ANA Code of Ethics also directs that the nurses primary concern is always for the patient and the best interest of the patient while Provisions 3.1 and 3.2 discuss the nurses responsibility for providing the patient with privacy and confidentiality, all of these provisions were ignored, to a degree, during the course of this scenario. While the scenario describes Mr. E as having a mild developmental disability we do not know his actual level of competence at the time the advanced directive and the medical power of attorney was signed. Just because he has a developmental disability does not mean that the disability was severe enough that the patient was unable to comprehend the choices he made when instituting these
The two find many bodies that have just had limbs and then they also found bodies with extra organs. The assumed killer is named “the surgeon.” The police cannot figure out a pattern to his work and no one suspects there could be more than one killer on the loose. ‘”So he was some kind of freak,” Michael said. “He looked normal on the outside. Maybe not a male model, but not the Elephant Man, either.
In many cases, people have been free from conviction because the evidence was not strong enough to convict them. If evidence is found, the new evidence cannot be used to undertake the individual
For example, they only looked at certain groups of people (butchers, doctors and slaughterers) and only people in the local area of Whitechapel were questioned, "the murders are supposed to be committed by someone residing in the immediate neighbourhood." This localising of questioning went against popular opinion that the Ripper looked foreign and might have come from a different area of London, or might have even been a foreign doctor (this idea was even suggested by Queen Victoria). This narrow line of enquiring may be the reason that the Ripper was not
If a small child should be punished for an action or deed that could cause harm to themselves or others, why shouldn’t young adults and adults have the same consequence? A criminal who claims their behavior was determined by science and be thrown into an institution will have no positive or learning experience. I believe if one pleas by reason of insanity, it’s simply only an excuse and a plea for help. Not all individuals are to be trusted as well. For example, one could persuade the judge to believe that genetics were the one to blame, however there’s been no family tree line of crimes that have been committed in the family.
I believe that gun control laws do not prevent crime; they just restrict legal citizens from protecting themselves. According to what recently has been portrayed by the media, the shooter involved in every major gun crime has had some type of mental problem, and in almost every case, the shooters showed signs of the mental disorder long before they committed their crime. Sadly, it seems nothing or very little was done to help the person in question. People with mental problems should be able to find and receive the help they need. In some cases, a family member tried to take the person affected to receive help, but they were turned away because of lack of resources.