Macbeth vs. Machiavelli

467 Words2 Pages
Many feel that from all of Machiavelli’s passages Macbeth would best fit into the category “Of those who by their crime come to be prince.” But it is the category “Of new princedoms acquired by the aid of others and by good fortune that helps best describe Macbeth. One of the most controversial topics in Macbeth is whether Macbeth’s actions were based on fate or freewill. This topic is slightly addressed in Machiavelli’s passage. The Duke of Valentino is quite similar to Macbeth they are both willing to do anything for the thrown. In Machiavelli’s passage he writes about people who have become king through “the aid of others/ good fortune” He shows that some people’s need for power is so intense that they would be willing to do just about anything to gain that power, even if it meant killing many people. This helps support the theory of Macbeth’s actions being based on freewill. Because of Macbeth’s own actions and greed he killed king Duncan and took control of the thrown. Macbeth’s actions are what Machiavelli would “favor and fortune of those who have made them great.” For if it had not been for the witches prophecy and the never ending commands given to Macbeth by his oh so demanding wife Lady Macbeth, Macbeth would never have even thought about killing Duncan and becoming king himself. Similar to Macbeth the Duke of Valentino also had an urge to gain power. And like Macbeth he was willing to do whatever it took for him to gain that power with the help of others. The Duke of Valentino became king through his alliances with other influential people that time. And after maintaining the position he had thrived for. His need for power grew stronger and stronger eventually he was willing to kill anyone who he felt would get in his way. Macbeth had an urge for power but he always kept it hidden from the world. But once the witches told him of their prophecy his urge

More about Macbeth vs. Machiavelli

Open Document