London in Postmodern and Postcolonial Discurs

284 Words2 Pages
In an article Tobias Wachinger said „ London officiates as an adequate raumsemantische Verortung …….” and calls “dominanten Satddiskurs” of the eighties in Great Britain. He illustrates that on the Satanic Verses of Salman Rushdies. Modern major cities dispose a big ambiguity. On one hand variety, abundance and the possibility of creating an own lifestyle and self-realization. And on the other disorientation. Wachinger uses the following distinction of those two sides. Writings of the postcolonial times describe London as a multiculture living environment. They deal with the “capacity of major cities, which try to combine and enable the plurality of culture”. They also point out the role of “a paradigmatic place where old and new concepts of national and cultural identity debate each other”. For Wachinger the discourses are not necessarily separated from each other. Comparing to The Satanic Verses as superposed or a “produktiv clash”. A closer research of this assumption seems remunerative, because it could take a closer look at the aspects of the literary exposure from cities. This exposure could occur from two different sides. Part of it would broach the issue of the city it self, with all the materialism, and the other side shows of the abstract of society. A concern of research is the combination of those separated approaches. “Postmodern” and “Postcolonial” should not be seen as totally contrarian. They should predominantly be seen as different tendencies. So what do those two discourses achieve to exposure London in selected novels, during the last decade of the 20th Century? In comparison, postmodern texts deconstruct fixed constructions from major cities and reality. In this case, referring to earlier London- texts and the complex history, London appears as “intertextuell produzierte
Open Document