Maybe it does sound cold, to say that somebody died due to their own irrational decisions. But it is also wrong to ridicule somebody else for a wrongdoing that they did not commit. Granderson sheds an important opinion on a touchy topic. Why are we aiming the decision to excessively drink, and not using common sense, they either got hurt or they died. It is important to make sure that people make good decisions, and step up for what they have
Response Paper #1 “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Passage Selection The first passage I chose that helped me better understand the reading was the line: “If I tried to get away with it, then other people would try to get away with it – and pretty soon we’d be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else.” It gives you the idea that what we now see in our modern society would have been almost completely incomprehensible to far past centuries. It also makes you wonder if the common desire for equality that we now strive for to make things equal for everyone can be taken too far. The second passage that I felt was important to me was: “Gee- I could tell that one was a doozy,” ”You can say that again.” ”Gee- I could tell that one was a doozy.” This selection was important to me because it gave me a better understanding of the situation. The previous events in the literature were very drastic and sad.
In the Essay “Pc is Ridiculous!” by Alison, the purpose of this essay is to state her opinion on the fact that she believes Political Correctness (pc) is ridiculous to her! She finds it to be so ridiculous that she begins to insult the people who participate in pc. The thesis of this statement begins in paragraph two, although paragraph one does not state much of a thesis because of the way she begins to vent and ramble on how ridiculous it is. But in paragraph two she states the purpose of why we or the populous participate in pc. She states that if we continue to participate we will be a “repressive society” which to me seems very one sided, she speaks to everyone in this essay, because she wants everyone to know that if you participate in the pc, we are not only being ridiculous but we are being a “repressive society.” This essay, or what seems to be an essay, is not an effective argument because of the way she argues, she does not see things from both sides, but she chooses to voice her side and why she thinks it is ridiculous!
When you tackle her she says Mr Salinky is confused so he won’t know what he’s eating. Firstly I would totally feel that this is a discriminatory act. My reason for my opinion on this is due to the neglectful actions when taking into account his cultural believes and wishes. I feel this act from another colleague actually borders on institutional abuse. Especially since I’d made attempts to challenge her on her reasons for giving him the meat.
In his interview with George Plimpton, Capote says (referring to the view of why Perry committed the murders) “I could have added a lot of other opinions. But that would have confused the issue, and indeed the book. I had to make up my mind and move toward that one view, always.” This statement can be enlarged in scope to resemble Capote’s editorial discretion througout the entirety of In Cold Blood: though his work is full of factual evidence, Capote admittedly edits the book with a certain purpose in mind, and his editing choices subconsciously affect the reader, possibly even moreso than a typical novel, since the reader is caught off guard while believing the book to be a “factual account.” For example, Capote portrays Perry in a very sensitive way, urging the reader to identify and sympathize with him even though some characters in the book, such as Perry’s sister, despise him. If Capote had focused on his sister’s point of view more than others, the reader would take from the story a negative view rather than a postive one; Capote’s real-life relationship with Perry, however, muddled his sense of objectivity and, in a strange way, cast Perry as a sort of fallen hero
I think that what should be done is what Sen. McCain proposes, I have gone many times through his plan and I think that is better than Sen. Obama’s plan. Sen. McCain explains clearly that withdrawing would bring total instability to Iraq which is true because right now there is not a stable government yet. If Sen. Obama’s Plan was followed then there would be a big problem because then it would be a fact that Iraq
Huck Finn Book Trial Opponents of the book are correct to say that, the word “nigger” is used 219 times in the book. However, how do the opponents reconcile this? In The case of MONTEIRO v. THE TEMPE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (1998)- “Words can hurt, particularly racist epithets,” Stephen Reinhardt wrote, “but a necessary component of any education is learning to think critically about offensive ideas. Without this ability, one can do little to respond to them.” Part of learning to think critically about offensive speech is to understand the context in which it is used. In a 3-0 ruling, the 9th U.S.
765 The understudies will feel offended or hurt with signs isolating others with expenses rising, cutting down dependent upon the race, and sex. As showed by Tina Korbe's article, "Remember the Racist Cupcakes? Fordham University Fights Back with Its Own Bake Sale" expressed, "Jackson told the San Francisco Chronicle that the arrangement was tasteless and damaging, "attacking underrepresented gatherings by diminishing their gatherings to a financially evaluated extraordinary." page. 765 This won't just bring about understudies and general people to feel or see the isolation proceeding in the get ready arrangement that happens on grounds.
Begging the Question - Give a restated conclusion as a premise for the conclusion You want to know why I failed the test? I failed the test because I didn't pass it. Straw Man - Misrepresent an opponent's position to make it easier to attack them; thus making one's own position seem much stronger The conservatives seem to think that anyone who disagrees with president Bush must be a terrorist or a sympathizer for terrorists. Inconsistency - argue for contradictory premises or for contradictory conclusions It's not that you're stupid. It's just that you're dumb.
The fact that I was under the age of smoking during the incident brought me fears. The fear of simply displeasing the law, which is in this case the higher authority, led me to reject the cigarette offered by my friend. Simply said, I believe that my authoritian conscience basically overrides my humanistic conscience during the