While attempting to follow criminal procedure during the investigation of a suspected drug dealer, Sally Martin, Detective Quickdraw finds himself being questioned about the legality of the search and seizure of Martin’s home. Detective Quickdraw believed that all of the facts regarding Martin dealing cocaine were there and obvious. While working undercover and besides hearing through the streets that Martin’s home was known as the drug house, Quickdraw observed the in-and-out traffic at the residence, which further led him to believe that the allegations were true. Another relevant fact was when informant Sneaky Pete returned to Quickdraw’s unmarked police car with a small amount of cocaine, which was purchased from a man inside of Martin’s home. In addition, Sneaky Pete was inside of Martin’s residence long enough to detect items that looked suspicious, such as the digital scales and the square object wrapped in a garbage bag.
The Pinkerton’s responded to the Homestead strike on July1892 as well as the Pullman strike in 1894(Clifford, 2004) Allan’s bravery and constant fight to capture the dishonest people had an impact on the private and security industry world today. The things Allan Pinkerton created is still portrayed in today’s time, such as communication through writing reports, cannot question a person under the influence, Allan also introduced the technology of photography (Hunt, 2009) by creating mug books of wanted criminals. In 1908 The FBI was created (Hunt, 2009) and was organized by using Allan Pinkerton’s model this is believed that this is where the FBI got the idea of creating the 10 most wanted
This article is a review on the book itself; however the article also talks about important points involving the main character Liesel Meminger “the book thief” and how they dealt with life during the war. As well as the significance of the first book she steals the grave digger’s handbook and the significance of her stealing books in the first place. Stealing books is a way for her to get revenge on things that have been stolen from her, and also how death (the narrator) tells the
Sasha Rivera Mr. Moran AP English Language/Composition-Period 1 2 December 2013 The Devil in the White City Critique In his nonfiction novel The Devil in the White City, Erik Larson uses the two main characters to juxtapose the themes of good and evil. The book parallels the lives of Daniel Burnham, the chief builder of the World’s Columbian Exposition, and H. H. Holmes, a serial killer, during 1890s Chicago. Larson recreates the 19th century city and the two main characters to explore the development of good and evil. The author achieves this purpose using rhetorical strategies and symbolism. The book is divided in six parts: Prologue, Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and the Epilogue.
The importance of secrecy is solidified by this and therefore, David and Rosalind decide to travel solely at night. On the following day, they are reached by the desperate cries of one of the captured Chrysalids; Katherine. We learn that she is being withheld against her will by the inspector. She is being tortured for information, unfortunately with success. Fortunately however, from what Katharine was forced to divulge, the inspector is only aware of the existence of David, Petra and Rosalind (and obviously Katherine).
The Roulet wheel of course denied all charges. But later, Mikey realized that the defendant could cheats him (as, for example, about studying at university). When he knew that Reggie Campo was a prostitute, because he left Roulet napkin with the address and price, Holler decided that it case closed in favor of his client. However, all assumptions have been destroyed, when the prosecutor, who named Minton said that the prosecution will not change course, and the trial will take place. The reason for that was the name of a knife Roulet, found in the blood at the crime scene.
The officer then spun Terry around while patting him down and found a weapon. Terry tried to get the weapon dropped due to illegal search and seizure but was denied due to the fact that an officer is justified in conducting a brief search of a person whom is found to be potentially dangerous. Before an officer can interrogate a person according to the sixth amendment, they must be told the right to a counsel. This comes about after the Gideon v Wainwright case in 1961. A burglary had occurred at a pool lounge.
In the play, the families got caught because a thief heard them upstairs, and he got away by telling the police that he knew where some Jews were. On page 519 the thief knows that the families are hiding because Mr. Dussel said “Thanks to this clumsy fool, there’s someone now who knows we’re up here! Someone now knows we’re up here hiding! In the movie, it was said that the wife of the owner of the building where the families were staying called the police and told them that the families were there. c. Another difference between the play and the movie is that in the play they didn’t go into detail about the concentration camps.
It seems as though Rita suggested to Roy that he should have the meeting over the property at their house and since Jonathan is a lawyer he can handle the legal issues that occur during this “complicated transaction of property.” However Jonathan could have easily doctored documents to give the entitlement of the property to Jonathan and the business associates once Roy was deceased. In order to cover their tracks and create a scapegoat to pin the murder on someone, Rita created an affair with the intention of Bobby to be the scapegoat. So as Jonathan and the business associates are in the other room, Rita intentionally places the letters to be found by Roy. And so the events happen according to the previous paragraph in which Roy attempted to kill Bobby, but then he defends himself by stabbing Roy with a knife. This explains why Jonathan was the one to report the murder, in order to appear innocent of the crime, however it seems as though the business associates and Rita doubled crossed Jonathan by placing a knife with the initials JLS.
The second chapter in Freakonomics asks the reader the following question: “How is the Ku Klux Klan like a group of real estate agents?” It is obvious the authors are not implying that the Ku Klux Klan engages in real estate transactions; nor does it imply that the real estate industry is filled with established terrorist hate groups. According to the authors, these two groups share a common trait in their dependence on “secret” information. Not only do the members of both parties need to possess the information necessary to succeed, but secrecy of the particular information is imperative, as well. The information they posses not only drive their success, but can be a liability as well. The Ku Klux Klan originally began as a social