Getting caught driving without a license is embarrassing and disappointing; however, if the driver shows good attitude and be honest, things tend not to go so bad. Before I got caught driving without a license, I would drive with free will; not knowing I could go to jail or have my car towed. Sometimes people depend on driving without a license to
It does this by adding taste and rhythm to it, especially the personification. For example “The dark sky, filled with angry, swirling clouds”, or “Gusts of wind made bits of paper danced between the parked cars”. The point of view in “The Treasure of Lemon Brown” was third person limited and only describes Greg’s thoughts of feelings to the reader. The point of view was key in the story because without much detail about everyone else, we were able to zoom the scope in on Greg more and examine the minor
Others may think the exclusionary rule should not be used to enforce the Fourth Amendment. They feel at times it is necessary for the exclusionary rule to not be used. I can understand their position because they are looking at putting the accused defendant behind bars and make sure they are punished to the fullest. At times without the exclusionary rule, the case in court can succeed and get the result the prosecution and maybe even what the public want. Sometimes people feel the defendant has too many rights and has more benefits, which could help them get away with criminal activity.
Then, as if dogged by luck, he set out again and discovered, behind the sign at the parking garage, a plastic Dellwood box, strong and clean, once used to deliver milk. Back in the doorway the grand design was revealed as he pushed the Dellwood box against the door and set its cardboard cousin two feet in front—the usual distance between coffee table and couch. Six full shopping bags were distributed evenly on either side. He eased himself with slow care onto the stronger box, reached into one of the bags, pulled out a Daily News, and snapped it open against his cardboard table. All done with the ease of IRT Express passengers whose white-tipped, fair-haired fingers reach into attaché cases as if radar-directed to the Wall Street Journal.
This is stating that there are laws in Chicago on noise levels to a certain degree and also shows that how it would be impossible to have one of Gatsby’s parties in 2012 because of the new rules but into place over the span of 92 years. Crimes such as bootlegging and murder were generally just a lot easier with the lack of technology and police training like we have present today in our lives and others to come. Also big parties are hard to have now days without cops showing up at your front door and someone getting arrested or shutting the party down, etc. many of us would love to have those freedoms back but what others fail to realize is that they made laws for a reason. If they were present in Gatsby’s time, who knows, maybe he would still be alive and everything would have gone completely
The narrator slips in bits of foreshadowing to allow the reader to expand their imagination of the scene at hand. The first clue is set right in the beginning of the story, and is very odd. The elderly couple leans “forward in the car, and the shower curtain spread over the front seat crackled and hissed.” (Meinke 259) The presence of the shower curtain is puzzling. None of the clues are clear until the end, it seems all so odd and out of place to have a shower curtain spread over a car seat, at this point one would just assume that this an anal-retentive couple, and they like things neat and in order. It’s a pretty common thing to find plastic spread over couches, and other furniture of an elderly couple; makes clean-up easy.
He could do many crazy things just to take revenge of the society. However, the ending of the story was surprising me. He is an imperturbable person. He found his own strategies that he believes make him less threatening such as, “Move about with care; give a wide berth to nervous people on subway platforms during the wee hours” or “have been calm” when he has been pulled over by the police. And in the comedy tone, he shows the way he acts when he walks on the late-evening constitutionals along streets less traveled by: whistling classical music.
Rich man. Kids allowance ignorance. ?? (No clue at the moment)?? Dillion is now hanging onto the side of my passenger door of my car listening to my dub-step.
Many of us have witnessed drivers dialing and talking on cell phones, resembling drunk drivers swerving all over the roads. Strong regulations are needed because drivers using phones are seriously impaired and because laws on negligent and reckless driving are not sufficient to punish these driving talkers. Laws on traffic safety vary from state to state, and drivers distracted by cell phones can get off with light punishment even when they cause fatal accidents. Running red lights, failing to stop for a school bus and drunk driving are just a few examples. An increasing number of studies show that driving while talking on a cellphone can be dangerously distracting.
This law would minimize the number of accidents that occur, I do believe. If cell phone use while operating a motor vehicle was against the law, I do believe it would only be far if the computers in a cop car should also be illegal. I say this because most of the time cops are focused on the computer and if they weren’t distracted by the computer they would also be able to prevent accidents that occur because of speeding. Another reason to adopt the law of cell phone usage while operating a motor vehicle would be because texting is against the law and we as citizens are required to follow the laws. It is overall dangerous to talk on the phone, and or text while operating a motor