Liberalism in the Ir Theory

1823 Words8 Pages
This critical response paper is based on the three articles, devoted to the liberalism theory in the international relations. The first work “Power and Independence”, written by Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, the ones of the most famous theorists in the world in sphere of the neoliberal institutionalism in international relation. This article brings several arguments in favor of complex interdependence to explain the international relations events and compare it with realists’ assumptions. Thus, the author states that realism theory, which was prevailing in the postwar period, is irrelevant for analysis of the current world politics. The reason for this is that classical realism theory defines states as dominant actors, and usage of force as an effective instrument in the any kind of politics. Thereby, realist does not consider any other crucial characteristics and other actors participate in the world politics, while complex interdependence approach does. Among them are: multiple channels, absence of hierarchy among issues, transnational and transgovernmental relations, international organizations. The second reading is “Neoliberal Institutionalism”, also written by O. Keohane. In this book the author claims that decentralization together with the institutionalization are the essential features of world politics, which exert significant impact on the behavior of governments, and states in general. As an outline of liberalistic perception of international relations the third book “Triangulating Peace” written by B. Russett and J. Oneal pays great attention to international organizations, economic interdependence, and democracy as the key factors in maintaining peace in the world. In addition, the authors states that transition from anarchy vicious circle to virtuous one will reduce the possibility of military conflicts and promote the wealth and
Open Document