Laws 310 Week 1

448 Words2 Pages
1. What is the definition of law? Its the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties. 6. Describe three major philosophical theories of law. The principal objective of analytic jurisprudence has traditionally been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. All forms of natural law theory subscribe to the Overlap Thesis, which is that there is a necessary relation between the concepts of law and morality. According to this view, then, the concept of law cannot be fully articulated without some reference to moral notions.The Conventionality Thesis emphasizes law’s conventional nature, claiming that the social facts giving rise to legal validity are authoritative in virtue of some kind of social convention. The Separability Thesis, at the most general level, simply denies naturalism’s Overlap Thesis; according to the Separability Thesis, there is no conceptual overlap between the notions of law and morality. 1. Summarize the facts that led to the defendant’s claim that he was subjected to double jeopardy. The double jeopardy claim can be supported by facts in the sense that Falkowsi had entered a plea which was unconditional in nature on November,1992.The case on October,1992 which stated that the Government had taken action in the property seizure of the illegal marijuana plantation.The civil case was taken up at fairbanks.Also on the charge of possession of marijuana a criminal case was lodged Anchorage.So Falkowski was tried on the same case both the times and so this was a case of double jeopardy. 2. What was (were) the legal question(s) before the court? The questions before the court were to identify the elements of the criminal offense and the claim that the
Open Document